By Jessica Hopper
Rock Center
Mimi Alford is speaking publicly for the first time about the secret she’s held for half a century. Alford claims that she had an 18-month-long affair with President John F. Kennedy when she was a White House intern.
“I think when you keep a secret and when you keep silent about something, you do it because you think it’s keeping you safe, but in fact, it’s deadly,” Alford told Meredith Vieira in an exclusive interview scheduled to air Wednesday on NBC’s Rock Center with Brian Williams.
In 1962, a 19-year-old Alford spent her summer in Washington, D.C., interning in the White House press office. She had just finished her freshman year at Wheaton College in Massachusetts. Four days into her internship, Alford claims that JFK aide, David Powers, invited her to go swimming in the White House pool. Alford was surprised when the 45-year-old president joined her and two others in the pool.
“It really didn’t seem unnatural, just because everybody was friendly and I went back to work afterwards,” Alford said. “No one said anything.”
Later that day, she says she received another call to visit the private floors of the White House. The naïve teenager didn’t question the president’s intentions when he asked to take her on a tour of the White House.
“The president came over to me and asked me if I’d like to take a tour of the second floor of the White House and see some of the rooms that had been redecorated. The last room that we went into was the bedroom and we walked into the bedroom and it was a beautiful room…I learned later that it was Mrs. Kennedy’s bedroom,” Alford said.
Alford says that she lost her virginity to the president in the first lady’s bedroom. In her soon to be released memoir, Once Upon a Secret: My Affair with President John F. Kennedy and its Aftermath, Alford described her first sexual encounter with the president writing that, “I wouldn’t describe what happened that night as making love, but I wouldn’t call it nonconsensual either.”
When asked if she felt overpowered by Kennedy, she told Vieira, “I think overpowered in the sense that he was the president. He was this unbelievably handsome man, 45 years old, overpowered in the fact that he had chosen me…and taken me on this tour. That's what I mean by being overpowered by the whole situation. Not overpowered physically that someone had grabbed me and done this to me and made me do something that I wasn't really willing to do, because I really think I was willing to do it.”
Alford emphasized to Vieira that if she had told the president no, he would have stopped. The affair continued for 18 months even after Alford returned to college.
“I think I was under the aura of, I had just a little bit of second thoughts, not enough to keep me from going back,” said Alford of the affair’s beginnings.
While interning, Alford would sometimes travel with the president. When she returned to college, he’d have arrangements made for her to come visit him. Sometimes, a limo would pick her up and take her to the airport to fly to Washington, D.C. Alford remembers doing homework in the limo as she headed to meet the president.
“I should have felt guilty. He was married to Mrs. Kennedy, but I didn’t at the time feel guilty,” Alford said.
Looking back now, Alford says that she realizes she was at Kennedy’s beck and call.
“I think that’s probably partly what makes me feel sad when I look back. It made me feel very special,” Alford said.
Alford described Kennedy as “boyish” and “shy” around her.
“I’m not going to say he loved me, but I think he did like me a lot. He cared about me,” she said. “Just the way he was, the way he smiled with me. I feel that he did. I feel that he actually cared about me.”
When pressed by Vieira about whether she really believes that Kennedy had genuine feelings for her or if believing that is simply a way for her to comfort herself all these years later, Alford said, “I think it’s a little bit of both.”
Now 68, Alford’s soon to be released memoir shares explicit details about the affair, including a claim that the president encouraged her to have sexual relations with at least one other person at the White House. Alford says that keeping the affair secret was more damaging than the affair itself. She said that it affected her relationships and contributed to the demise of her first marriage.
Alford was first publicly outed in 2003 when historian Robert Dallek wrote 37 words about an unnamed intern who had an affair with Kennedy in his biography of Kennedy called An Unfinished Life. The New York Daily News identified her and Alford issued a simple written statement confirming her secret relationship. She faded into obscurity, but said that the secret eventually became too much to hold inside.
“It’s not so much that I feel that I’m exposing myself, it’s that I’m really unburdening myself, it was a very difficult thing for me to do,” Alford said. “In fact, most mornings when I woke up I thought I don’t want to get up and write this book, I want to hide under the covers.”
Editor’s Note: Meredith Vieira’s exclusive interview with Mimi Alford airs Wednesday, Feb. 8 at 9pm/8c on NBC’s Rock Center with Brian Williams. Vieira talks to Alford at length in the author's first candid interview.











These kind of topics are really what NBC is cut out to do. Not hard journalish, and the word hard is correctly used in a couple of different meanings of the word. NBC and other networks, although I'd be hard pressed to cite one more guilty of bias, are in the business of protecting "everything Obama". The calamitous "lead from behind policy in the Middle East, little to no coverage of "Fast and Furious", all the "Crony Capitalism" that's gone on in the Obama 3 years, and a true reporting of the depth of our economic troubles. No reporter will step-up and tell the American People what's happening with their government. Although I make an exception to the 3 major networks for Sharyl Atkisson at CBS. She's in more danger than someone getting between Chuck Shumer and a TV camera in Washington. What a gutty, strong individual. She can look herself in the mirror and say she's doing the job.. History will tell the tale, and for a change it won't be written by NBC.
Please epalin how this has anything to do with the current President? I'd be more impressed if you stayed on topic.
Seems like Clinton was not alone in tapping into the White House "Intern Pool"............whatever happened to ethics, principles, respect, prefessionalism or just knowing what is right from wrong.....plain and simple?
LOL! Take an article about Kennedy and turn it in to a "bash Obama" post! Quite clever!
Connect the dots LadyC.
Rant much about unrelated topics?
My biggest complaint since Obama came on the scene is how little work the media does to get the president to talk about important issues. I think I have figured out why they do not pursue him like they have many others, especially republicans.
The media wants to embarrass republicans and so they poke and prod until finally they get what they hope is a "gotcha moment". The same would be true if they poked and prodded Obama, but they don't dare do it because he would give them plenty to bash him about and that isn't their intent. So they softball every interview hoping to reveal absolutely nothing except portraying him as a fun guy with a family. End of story. So Obama, the "teacher" teaches us nothing because the media won't do their job. We learn absolutely nothing about the issues which is sad. I don't want the media to try to catch the president saying things that might produce a "gotcha moment", but I want substance. They call him "dude" which shows you how they want to be his friend, instead of protecting the public by reporting facts no matter how pleasant or harming.
I agree that NBC is a lightweight anymore, and has lost all credibility as a serious news network.
Does anyone really think unethical behavior by presidents is a new concept? Or unethical behavior period? If you think for a minute that presidents, men in power, or just people in general didn't have affairs or deceive people or behave respectfully 100, 200, 1000 years ago, you are not quite living in reality...
Get real. Men have been attracted to younger women since the dawn of time. Your puritan ethics have never worked - not for the puritans and not for anyone else because they're unnatural and nature always wins out in the end.
Many United States Presidents just like any other men have had dalliances throughout history. Clinton and JFK were probably more the norm than your sainted Ronald Reagan.
theboys,
Watch Faux much? The most uneducated group of viewers out there, can proudly claim Fox as their news channel!
Rex---you are all over the map-----and you seem very tense.
Relax.
Oh, the other Boleyn girl.
I quit being scandalized by mistresses a long time ago. All kings, prime ministers have them. Why is this important?
I'd be really impressed if you could check your spelling before hitting the "Post Comment" button.
But to help you out, I believe the fellow was attempting to help people like you learn just a little bit about crooked politician's and the Lame Stream Media that protect them,.... when of course it suits their agenda.
Heck I'd still do her!
What's this article have to do with Obama?!
It seems there more than a handful of youngster's (or liberals in denial) unaware of the fact that the Lame Stream Media at large jealously protected JFK,... exactly like they coddle and protect Obama.
If it's not to painful, it might be beneficial for those confused by the linking between the 2 subjects, i.e. (JFK & Obama) to do a little bit of self-educating. But if feel your beliefs lay solidly with Liberal beliefs, forget about it, you'll never see it.
What the hell does this have to do with an affair that happened I think before Obama was born. This is also is fault?
You right wingers have lost all prospective in your hate for the President. A complete failure of being able to think with any kind of open mind.
The funny thing is, as I read the story I was wondering how someone would spin this towards the current administration and instead we get some babble with no connection to the story whatsoever.
I honestly believe that some people are hired to go to stories (not read the stories) and just post propaganda. The Internet is 95 % lies as it is so this is par for the course.
Now back to the story. It is amazing what comes out years down the road. What other secrets were able to be kept in the past 50 to 100 years. What would Clinton's presidency had been like if they could have kept everything hush. What would JFK's presidency been like if they would have found out at the time it happened.
Now we live in the I need to know everything era. Nothing is sacred and you will find something wrong with every single human being in the world if you look hard enough. From Popes to pimps everyone has something in their past. How bad it is only depends on the spin we put on it.
Current politics is a glorified game of king of the hill. What politicians talk about least is actual politics. He had an affair, he smoked pot, he cheated on his taxes, he got a hummer etc....sorry, I don't have any references to "she". Getting elected is a prize these days. It's not, "thank you for putting your trust in me" it's "I WON I WON". Time to thank everyone for their hard work in getting me this victory, I mean getting me elected. Time to go help my friends that gave the most, I mean get to work fixing this badly damaged country.
Okay, I am getting off topic. Stop rooting for the team and start rooting for the player. Both parties have been involved in ruining this country. Take off your blinders and look at the last 30 years, not just the current administration so you can see a little more clearly.
Congratulations New York Football Giants on winning Superbowl XLVI!!!
(from a Colts fan)
I think infidelity is the ultimate insult to one's spouse. The wife/husband gets the grief and the "lover" gets all the "good stuff".
How many times is "my wife/husband just doesn't understand me like you do" being said across the country as this is written?
This is what groomers do. They get vulnerable young people to believe that they care about them and then manipulate them into doing what they want. In this regard, JFK deserves nothing but contempt.
Duphas - Notice how Lady C squeaked Palin's name in her comment and nobody even caught it?
Can't help but be reminded of all the Herman Cain comments I've read on here.
If we are finding guilt by association then Nixon made all the Republican presidents crooks, now maybe there is some truth to that.
I think folks on the right cannot stand the fact that the economy is improving and jobs are coming bad and the fact that President Obama has pretty much delivered on majority of his commitments, catching Bin Laden, getting out of Iraq, timetable to get out of Afghanistan, Jobs growth, economic growth, healthcare, etc etc. Do you want to question any of his accomplishments? Hmmm, maybe Bin Laden escaped on his escape pod and is now living on the moon? Maybe that's why Romney wants us to go to the moon, again and waste trillions of dollars of public money. Let's take the war against terror to the moon.
Men (and women) in power almost always fall prey to the belief that they are entitled. They somehow justify their activities. Sex, drugs, stealing money.
Expecting these people to behave in a "moral" fashion is just ridiculous. Just doesn't happen. Too many people flattered by the attention, especially young girls. The difference between 1960 and now is that the press protected the president. For example, the affair of Dwight D. Eisenhower with Kate Summersby was not outed until the 1990's.
I think this lady is a class act. She kept it to herself for 40 years. Why not write a book now? It wasn't like it was a 1 night stand. I know I'd be writing a book if I was in that position.
I believe the issue is, the media picks sides, and is oblivious to the actions of the side the media has chosen while playing gotcha with the opposing side.. In that sense, this is what is going on right now with the Obama administration. And please don't justify it just because FOX does it.
Power Corrupts. Absolute Power corrupts ABSOLUTELY!
Sirlafalot - Can I watch and then take a turn?
about that, which one would you be lusting after?
The Kennedy men had "balls." Remember, old Joseph P. Kennedy was a big-time bootlegger during Prohibition. Edward Kennedy terminated his mistress, Mary Jo Kopechne, in Chappaquiddick Creek - whether accident or murder, we will never know. Robert Kennedy, according to some accounts, had the chutzpa to blackmail J. Edger Hoover to do the President's bidding. These were never nice people. Give them an inch, and they would take it all with not even the slightest twinge of a conscious.
Whoops! My bad - the last word should have been "conscience". I should have done a better job proofreading my comment. I apologize.
and you forgot republican luminaries like Mark Sanford David Vitter, Newt, Larry Craig, Mark Foley, rushthedruggie, Reagan on hsi first wife, etc...back to Faux News for Idiots for you
uhhh.....Clinton is a weiner..but I know what you're saying...
A yes, and let us not forget fdr.
JFK enjoys mostly undeserved respect among the American People. Aside from being a womanizer abusing his position, he almost caused WW3 with his provocative and reckless decisions during the Cuban missile crisis. He was just lucky yet again.
I'm married to the job but I do cheat occassionally
I can tell you right now if your reading this Ms. Alford what he liked about you...its between your legs....and that's about it.
Didn't anyone in the administration at the time think it was strange that 19 year old Mimi Alford was being picked up by a limo and flown to Washington D.C. during that 18 month period? President Kennedy had a lot more people than just those in the press watching his back!
This is truly a sad reflection on this American Icon!
Duphas, pretty funny that you would call someone out on their spelling...
I think you meant to type "If it's not TOO painful.." didn't you?
Just sayin'...
I tell you what, the biggest thing I see on here is how the liberals attack those who believe differently than they do, or if you say something about one they worship. Just attack, call names. But if you call them one back, you're not being civil. Bunch of a**holes.
Dufas:
Perhaps if you could leave your hatred for our president at the door, you might see thinks a little clearer! All that FAUX spin is clouding reality.
Back in the 60's there were no cell phones with cameras to catch a young girl getting into a limo. The only images people saw of politicians were on the 6:00 news in black and white. Men were allowed to have affairs as long as they did it on the down low and didn't embarrass their wives. It was a different world than that in which we now live.
I'll tell you what happens to them. They tend to be put aside when someone enters politics.
Blackbird said:
If you read the article, Mrs. Kennedy was sleeping in a separate bedroom. Doesn't sound like they were "together" anymore.
This is the story of a young girl who was victimized by a sexual predator - pure and simple. The fact that it was the president makes it more sensational but it is not political - it's sick and tragic and has haunted her all of her life. Have some compassion for her and show some intelligence and leave the politics out of it.
LadyC-1223368 It is obvious what REX HOLM is saying. NBC, rather than putting a critical, investigative eye on Obama, is pulling out 50 year old news, that isn't worth a damn.
Everyone knows that Joe Kennedy bought the election for his son Jack and flaunted his mistresses under his wife's nose. When Joe Kennedy had his stroke, his wife kicked the two mistresses living in the house out and made Joe Kennedy's rest of his life miserable.
Lets get back to shining some bright light on Obama and his stupidities.
I want to see his education transcripts.
I want to see who paid for his education and why he never had to get a job before getting a two bit research job at a small civil rights law firm
I want to know why he gave his Pastor Wright a custom made job at the White House, what is his salary, duties, results and if he ever showed up for work.
I want to know why Obama's relatives are still in the U.S. illegally and who is paying them?
I want to know the exact reason for Obama's birth as his mother refused to live with Obama's father.
I want to know why Obama ordered a kill on bin Laden instead of a capture.
I want to know why bin Laden's body was dumped at sea before the DNA tests were completed.
I want to know why Obama who lacks any education in military science, political science, economics, finance or business, believes he has the right to be president of the U.S.
I want to know why, as state senator of Illinois, none of his 130 initiatives were ever made into laws.
I want to know why Obama is not studying the successful private schools such as Urban Prep which is sending 100% of it graduating seniors who are black and from Illinois Ghettos to 4 year accredited universities and Obama is not sending advisers to study the success and change the public school systems to emulate this success.
I want to know why Obama slashed research funds into hydrogen as a fuel 90% in the U.S. budget, while China, England, Japan and Norway are spending billions on the research. Hydrogen is a 100% unlimited, renewable, nonpolluting fuel that can be used in current internal combustion engines and in 5 years can make the U.S. energy independent.
The light has to be shone brilliantly on this incompetent excuse not only as president but a human being.
Does Mimi think anyone really cares.
She just wants her 15 minutes of fame and a good book deal.
Walkingman:
Doesn't it get exhausting walking around with all that hatred bottled up inside?
Onewonan (was that supposed to be Onewoman?)
That was beautifully written. I don't think anyone could have expressed this better!
oh shut up, Walkingman.
This was important for this woman to reveal, why? Had she any class she would have taken it to her grave with her. Clearly she's hawking her book. Too bad she does it at the expense of Kennedy's living daughter. She has only made herself look like a tramp. Had she kept it to herself, no one would have ever known.
Jo-An-4354969 Simple, Obama is an unqualified to be president as Jack Kennedy was. Old Joe Kennedy wanted a son to be president and spent millions greasing the skids in Illinois and Texas. Johnson was selected as vice presidential candidate to deliver Texas and Daley was paid millions to hold back the Chicago vote until late in the morning the next day to know how many votes he had to deliver to put Illinois electoral vote in the Kennedy column.
Nbc has self promulgated that it is a liberal mouthpiece and Rex Holm and I object to wasting top headline space on a 50 year old piece of fluff instead of going after Obama for all the shi* he is pulling and has pulled.
Obama will be known as America's Chamberlain.
A note to the point I made earlier: During the Cuban Missile Crisis, a confrontation on the stationing of Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba, is often considered as having been the closest to a nuclear exchange. The crisis peaked on October 27, when a U-2 was shot down over Cuba and another almost intercepted over Siberia, and a Soviet submarine nearly launched a nuclear-tipped torpedo in response to depth charges ordered by JFK (with the launch being prevented by an officer named Vasiliy Arkhipov). If it was not for the cool head of this Russian officer, JFK would have started WW3.
Jo-An-4354969 Don't you feel incompetent that you can't answer any of those questions and your hero refuses to answer them?
You elected him. You pay his salary and you know nothing about the man. I am pointing out exactly his shortcomings and why he should not lead this great country again.
Now I want to see Obama's education transcripts. He refuses to divulge them.
Romney is going to divulge all his educational transcripts and show exactly what courses he took, his grades and how he paid for all his education.
What are you going to do when Obama refuses?
Everyone yelled and screamed about Romney's tax records and lo and behold, he is a financial genius. He went from nothing to a tremendously wealthy man. He fulfilled the American dream all by himself. The small inheritance from his father he gave to charity.
Are you jealous, you didn't use the same opportunities to become financially wealthy, comfortable and satisfied?
walkingman,
Listen to PhillyGirl!
People like you only have on objective....
1- 6 It is none of your D--- business. 7-Because we elected him and you fools forgot to steal the election. 8- It is not his job He is the president and I for one am sick to death of the name calling, judgemental bull---- that you ignorant people can think up. HE IS MY PRESIDENT. HE IS YOUR PRESIDENT.Get over it
Don't take your love to town.
Just how in the hell is this story "news" ?
Why not write a story about Poppy Bush's paramour Jennifer Fitzgerald - heck that went on for years and brought Barbara to a nervous breakdown
And all you Republicans including Baker his chief of staff covered this up for years
Google - Jennifer Fitzgerald
Max^108 I don't know if you knew the following: Unknown to U.S. intelligence for 30 years, the Soviet Union had sneaked about 100 small nuclear weapons into Cuba at the time of the 1962 missile crisis, in addition to its more powerful strategic missiles.
Although these nuclear tactical weapons were under the control of the Russians, had the U.S. invaded Cuba, the Russians were authorized to use them against the invading U.S. forces.
Needless to say, Cuba would have been wiped off the map along with every single Russian soldier stationed there.
Who knows what Russia would have done had the Russians used nuclear weapons first against a U.S. invading force against Cuba.
The tactical nuclear weapons were later returned to Russia. Russia considered Castro too unstable to leave them in Cuba.
Jo-An-4354969 It was said by a great philosopher that people who only listen or what to read there own opinions are afraid of reflecting on a divergence of opinion. They need the security of daily hearing or reading what they think they know. They want to hear their dogma repeated day after day to not lose their blind corrupted faith.
Does that description fit you?
Barbara Adams Jackson If you want to complain about the article, then complain to NBC. They wrote it and published it.
stressedinnebraska What do you call a person, you put in a job and pay his salary? He is your employee. In this case Obama is our public servant and is responsible to every American citizen. He is not our king or dictator.
The reason that democracy and the constitution works is we are allowed to challenge the people who we deem unfit to lead us and remove them.
Or have you forgotten that?
Have my question forced you to look at the difficult questions that Obama are going to have to answer in the upcoming election?
As for this woman being a woman of "Class", if she'd had class she wouldn't have been screwing around with a married man. And she wouldn't be advertising it when there is no one around now to dispute her.
While I agree that sometimes People with POWER feel that they are better than everyone, can have all they want, it takes two. Whether it's JFK's lovers or Tiger Woods it comes to the same thing. Can't blame JUST on the person in Power, but the one they are cheating with too.
journal journal...I wonder if you thought it was "important" when Gingrich's ex told her tale. Or when Cain's accusers came out.
Good ole JFK. The man that did most of his thinking with his dick.
Jo-An-4354969 I have one objective in the 2012: To turn the rascals out, and that includes Obama.
He is unfit to be president of the U.S.
alan290 You got that right, a chip off the old block.
Sirlafalot,
Heck yeah! What a G.I.L.F.!
She is lucky she didn't die like Monroe. Most likely a hit.
If you want to catch a Democrat, bait the trap with poontang.
If you want to catch a Republican, bait the trap with cash.
Suze the Muze: "I think this lady is a class act."
How does the phrase "class act" fit into a story of a young woman who had an affair with a married man? A young woman who performed oral sex on another man at the urging of her married lover, while he watched?
Typical slut. Rich, powerful, good looking man, and she instantly spread her legs.
Jusbidenmytime,
This is news to you? This is probably one of dozens JFK had in his harem. Kennedy was a notorious womanizer.
As life begins to end, the statement, youth(wisdom) is wasted on the young takes on more meaning. We have the advantage to look back in history and see how many mistakes we made on electing incompetents, idiots and unqualified people to represent us.
Yet we still do it. Politics has become a beauty contest and a popularity contest.
We just can't find educated, qualified, honest people to elect as our leaders.
We have to realize that we as the electorate can not made knowledgeable decisions about all aspects of politics and we need to choose the best, the most intelligent, most able bodied and experienced at every level to lead.
And frankly, we get shi* that only think about themselves and their bank accounts and how they can manipulate the system for themselves.
Clinton never should have been elected. He lost his first election by 15,000,000 popular votes due to Perot splitting the conservative vote. Carter was a knee jerk reaction to Nixon and Ford.
Nixon was competent but thought too much of himself. Had he admitted that he was involved in the Watergate break in from the start and took full responsibility, I believe the public would have allowed him to remain as president.
Clinton was an @!$%#.
Bush Jr. wasted his time not immediately destroying Iraq and Afghanistan and letting them rebuild.
Of course Kennedy was an incompetent. Johnson was an idiot for getting the U.S. deeper into VietNam.
Where are the leaders?
So. John F. Kennedy liked to screw. In other news, the Sun rose in the east this morning.
He's not my president.......I don't have an ounce of respect for his lies. While Michelle was never proud of american, until her "this is the first time I've been proud of my country". This is the "First time I've been completely embarrassed by the lying President we have"
This should come as no shock to anyone. Most high-level politicians are pretty much narcissistic psychopaths. Think about it. Would any normal person engage in the kind of backstabbing, scheming, and dirty dealing that politicians have to do to succeed, just for a very very very small chance of being a big-shot someday? They have to be in love with their own legend to begin with. So obviously when they finally hit the jackpot they are going to abuse their power. They might not all have affairs, but you can bet they are doing something shady. That's one of the main problems with our system, the only people who have a chance to become leaders are jerks that have no business being leaders. JFK rigged his high-school class president election so he could win. You think he'd cheat to get something completely worthless but not abuse the power of the POTUS? I wouldn't trust any president or other major politician to walk my dog, let alone run my country. They haven't quite destroyed the country yet, but they are working overtime on it.
NextMSNBCStar Hate to burst your bubble but Robert Kennedy worked for that terrible Republican Joseph McCarthy on his father's orders. Joe Kennedy and Joe McCarthy were best friends till McCarthy died. Joe Kennedy wanted one of his sons to be president and he didn't care if they ran as Republican or Democrat. Unfortunately, Nixon ran as a Republican in 1960 so old Joe Kennedy had Jack run as a democrat.
You remember how old Joe Kennedy was ordered home from England as he got too cozy with Hitler and badmouthed the socialist Churchill.
The only things that interested Joe Kennedy was money, women and getting his son elected president and it didn't mean a god damn thing which party his son used to get elected.
Why bring this up now? what good will come from it (money)? its not fair there is no one alive to contest or confirm it, and more then that its no ones business to know who she boinked in 1961! I Never read the story, doubt I will its a wast of time just like reading the few post I randomly scanned through, pres gets laid in 1960 effects chances of 2012 election? get a life people. this is a sad state of affairs.
Wow, the wingnuts are really freaking out about Obama's increasing chances for winning the election in November. No matter what the topic, they have to turn it on it's head as an Obama-bashing opportunity.
Rex, all those issues you mention HAVE been covered on the other networks, it's just that they choose not to focus on them 24/7 and ignore everything else going on in the world. That would be rather unbalanced and, well, lower them to the level of, say, Fox News.
Sad but not surprised You haven't ever worked in a big company have you? Back stabbing, corruption, lying and betraying your friends is how you get ahead.
Nobody is going to tout your horn except yourself. But be careful who you step on getting to the top, you just may meet them on your way down.
Rick-in-SD The more the liberals squeal, the more they feel threatened. Just look at the odds. The populace is dissatisfied with congress. The democrats have the majority in the senate. They have the most to lose. The republicans are solid in the south. The states with the worse economic outlook are blue states.
Nothing can help Obama. Israel is going to bomb Iran and the U.S. is going in with them. And it is going to be bloody. Obama knows nothing about military strategy and changes his military advisers as often as he changes his underwear.
Obama had the chance to get Iran when it was early and take out the nuclear plants before they were dug deep in solid rock and 30 yards of reinforced concrete. Will the thousands of bunker buster bombs on Diego Garcia and the thousands in Israeli hands do the job?
Kind of late to find out. Remember Obama got a degree from Columbia in PHILOSOPHY! He never studied military science, never studied economics, finance, business, or political science. You elected this man, you are stuck with him.
Explain why he killed and not captured bin Laden? Real smart there! All that information in his head died right there in that room! And Obama got rid of the body before DNA supposedly confirmed it was bin Laden's body.
You sure do have a military and social science genius as your president.
@walkingman1, you say that, had Nixon "admitted that he was involved in the Watergate break in from the start and took full responsibility, I believe the public would have allowed him to remain as president." Really??? If Nixon admitted he participated in blatantly breaking the law, the public would have said, oh that's fine, forget about it.
You say "Bush Jr. wasted his time not immediately destroying Iraq and Afghanistan and letting them rebuild." Huh??? How about Bush lied to us. He ignored the UN weapons inspectors who were on the ground and found there were no WMDs. He ignored the fact that his claim that Hussein was purchasing uranium from Niger to make a nuke was based on a forged, falsified document. He used these lies to send 4000 of our military to their deaths in an unjust war against a country that had done nothing to us, nor was a threat to us, consequently costing us many billions upon billions of dollars, largely paid to corrupt contractors like Cheney's Haliburton, through no-bid contracts. All of it a waste of taxpayer resources and lives. You forgot to mention that he also ignored the August 6, 2001 memo titled "bin Laden determined to Strike Inside the United States," which discussed his plans to hijack airplanes (his response was to go on vacation for the next month). Oh, and I could go on an on and on about Bush Jr.
You completely left out Reagan and his secret arms-for-hostages arrangement, and the fact that, while he was selling arms to Iran to use against Iraq (and his friend, Hussein), he was permitting the sale to WMDs to Iraq to use against Iran. When he wasn't doing that, he was napping.
To theboys (po):
To quote you in post # 1.6:
And then of course there is Faux News that is so passe and the joke of the decade.
1 is mostly on-topic, which is why it's restored. Some other, further off-topic derails, not restored, nor this:
Skiddy, you know the rules. You're suspended for a week for violating #1 of the Code of Honor.
@ SUZE #1.25 Summersby's book was released in the 70's, shortly after Ike died, not the 90's. The "affair" she described consisted of two FAILED attempts at intercourse. One does wonder how this could be considered an affair even if it were true. However, there is NO credible evidence that there was anything other than a friendly working relationship between the two.
@walkingman1, get your facts straight. These are the states with the highest unemployment rates:
South Carolina 9.5% (Republican governor, red state)
Georgia 9.7% (Republican governor, red state)
Illinois 9.8% (Democratic governor, blue state)
Florida 9.9% (Republican governor, swing state)
North Carolina 9.9% (Democratic governor, swing state)
DC 10.4% (Democratic mayor, government controlled by Congress)
Mississippi 10.4% (Republican governor, red state)
Rhode Island 10.8% (governor is an independent, blue state)
California 11.1% (current governor, Democrat, previous, Republican, blue state)
Nevada 12.6% (Republican governor, red state)
Do we all have to put every bit of blame on men? It would have been quite simple to say NO, and that likely would have been all there was to it. Sure JFK was a dog like an awful lot of men. And with out a welcoming woman, we would soon be extinct. What you will read will be a titalating story, juicy and about a once powerful man. But it surely could have been almost any man and woman.
Rick-in-SD Clinton was caught in adultery and lying to congress about his affair with Lewinsky, he was impeached and congress did not relieve him of his duties.
I lived through Watergate and thought how stupid it was for Nixon to not say "mea culpa" "these men worked for me and they did this! I accept full blame and responsibility and humbly beg your pardon for allowing this to happen!"
That would have given Nixon a chance. The route he took gave him no chance.
That is my opinion. If congress is going to allow Clinton to perjure himself and allow him to continue as president why is it not conceivable that the same would have happened to Nixon. He saved thousands of lives by ending the Viet Nam war, the economy was good and he had served 6 years. He was a hard bitter but very intelligent man. Matter of fact he was 100 times more intelligent than Obama.
Rick you forget who Chemical Ali was and how he got the nickname? He was Saddam's cousin and murdered thousands of Kurds, Southern Iraqis and Iranians with what? Poisonous deadly gas and what is that called a WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION! Why did Iraq in 1991 purchased a shipment of nuclear triggers for nuclear bombs. This shipment was intercepted in England.
Now why would Iraq buy nuclear triggers?
What were the three reasons that bin Laden gave for attacking the World Trade Center?
1. Kill Americans
2. America's support for Israel
3. The American embargo on Iraq.
Okay Rick you know all the answers, where did the poisonous gas go to that Iraq manufactured and used?
Why did Iraq buy nuclear triggers in 1991?
Where was it going to get nuclear material it was going to use the nuclear triggers for?
Now the World Trade Center was bombed because of the embargo on Iraq and this was used as an excuse to kill over 3000 Americans, half of which cannot be identified. What are you going to do about Iraq?
Think for a minute. The U.S. has to have a dramatic and awe inspiring response for this attack on U.S. soil. The U.S. goes into Afghanistan and leaves the back door open in Iraq? Is that smart?
Iraq was not supposed to have nuclear material in 1991 when it bought the nuclear triggers. Why did it buy them?
Libya was not supposed to have WMD and the revolution discovered that Daffy lied and WMD were found in Libya.
You forget that Saddam wanted to take over the whole region and invaded Kuwait and was going after Saudi Arabia. You also forgot that examples had to be made so other countries did not attack the U.S.
Are you that incapable of using logic and reason?
You forget that Clinton was offered bin Laden three times and refused? You forget that Carter armed and instigated bin Laden against the Russians in Afghanistan?
Under Clinton, at least three opportunities to have Bin Laden handed over to the U.S. were rejected inexplicably.
According to the Sunday Times of London, Clinton himself said his refusal to accept the offer to hand over Bin Laden was the "Biggest Mistake" of his presidency.
According to anonymous sources in the CIA, Clinton did not want Bin Laden arrested.
What is wrong with letting two mad dogs fight to the death. It gave the U.S. peace.
@walkingman1
That is exactly my point. At the top of any organization you will find its most ruthless member, not its best. We are governed by those sleazy enough to want to be politicians. As Groucho Marx said "I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member."
Rick-in-SD Learn to read. I said with the worse economic outlook. Not with the worse unemployment figures.
Sad but not surprised You hit the nail right on the head!
Walkingman1--I will guess that you are one of those people who are paid to sit at home and repeat silly questions over and over to drag down the conversation in threads like this one. Who pays you? Are you here illegally? Is that your short form or long for birth certificate? Why do you have so much time during a working day to post over and over? I want to see your transcripts, your bank records . . . well, no I don't. The point is that the "questions" you have listed here are silly and easy to answer. You don't deserve an answer--but here they are:
That isn't a question--it's a statement. In fact, most all of your points are statements and not questions. One can't answer a statement. The point is that Obama went to two undergraduate schools--Occidental and Columbia--and neither one admits people who can't perform reasonably well. Harvard law school doesn't admit people who don't perform reasonably well; the University of Chicago law school won't employ people who don't perform reasonably well. From Columbia through U of Chicago, somebody saw his transcripts or he wouldn't have gotten in. Only if you believe that a person with one black relative is too stupid to be admitted to a prestigious school unless something is amiss would you even imply that his transcripts must be atrocious or a red flag that needs to be looked at. He was at least a C student in his undergraduate work, and he was at least a C student in his law school work. His transcripts are at the least acceptable, if not stellar. I wouldn't mind seeing his transcripts--but, I'd really like to see Sarah Palin's, as her university record (so many schools in so short a time) sends up red flags that she was either consistently flunking out or one step ahead of the academic misconduct committee. You haven't been shown his transcripts for the same reason we haven't seen Palin's--one doesn't have to produce transcripts to be a politician. You can want it all you like--but it doesn't have to be done.
Barack Obama worked two jobs after his BA, the first with Business International Corporation--which has been known to be used as a CIA front company. I wouldn't call that a small civil rights firm. As for his BA--his grandparents probably paid for that, as they were well-to-do. Back in the day (and I matriculated back then), it was rare for students to hold jobs, particularly when they were at Columbia. First, research the number of students at Columbia during that time period who held jobs in addition to their studies and prove that this is a red flag, and then I will worry. Until then, you can want it all you like--but politicians don't have to produce much in terms of personal data when they run for office, and typically do not.
Are we discussing Jeremiah Wright? He does not have a job with the White House. He is not merely retired from his pastoral job, he is persona non grata and was disinvited from a lot of invitations because of his inflammatory statements. Obama has disavowed him. First, demonstrate that he does have a job--then ask this question. If you ask a question about something that doesn't exist ("I want to know why NASA isn't investigating mining cheese on the moon, and I wan't to know now"), there really isn't any effective way of answering it. This is called a "loaded question"--and that's why you don't get an answer.
This is a silly question. Any individual who is first generation in the US is extremely likely to have an "illegal" relative or two. In any case, Zeituni Onyango was in the US illegally, her request for asylum had been denied. She is now in the US legally, as her request was reopened and asylum granted in 2010. Onyango Obama is currently in the system, trying to avoid deportation. But, he is in the process of being deported if he doesn't win--it's a fairly common process. Both are private people, and neither has to disclose whom they are working for except to the IRS.
Well, a mama and daddy birdie who love each other very much sometimes get certain "urges." Steve Jobs' mother did not live with his father until after she became older--and then they divorced because of his patriarchal attitudes. Many US girls become involved with "exotic" boys, and then realize that those "exotic" boys come from cultures which treat women really badly, like chattals. The failure of such relationships is common. Also, Obama's mother was said to be a difficult personality--this is why he preferred living with his grandparents. There is no reason to see a red flag here--this is a fairly common situation.
GW Bush proclaimed bin Laden "wanted dead or alive" a long time ago. When a person is proclaimed "wanted dead or alive," that person is wanted "dead." In any case, capturing a terrorist leader would place the US in danger of retaliation. Killing him quickly avoids any lingering problems--it's Machiavellian, but it's effective. I want to know if GW Bush had a similar policy in place--but I'm not likely to find out, as such things are classified. That's why you don't know either. But, in any case, this was Bush's policy, carried out by Obama, and praised by Cheney. Why do you see red flags?
See above--bin Laden's body was a politically "hot potato." One throws hot potatoes away for good reason. Only if you really think that bin Laden wasn't killed would this matter--and no one, not even Cheney or any terrorist organizatin, claims that bin Laden is still alive. In any case, it is just as likely to surmise that he wasn't killed (the "kill order" was a ruse) and bin Laden is currently in Guantanamo enjoying the typical hospitality of the CIA. But, most of us think that bin Laden is dead; Elvis is also dead; Michael Jackson is dead. You can be a conspiracy theorist if you want to--nothing satisfies a conspiracy theorist, and that's why you have no "answer."
All non-naturalized US citizens have the "right" to be president if they meet the age requirements. I notice that you conveniently left out "law" in your little list. Obama has a degree in political science with a specialty in international relations. So, your question is simply fallacious.
What do you mean by "his" and what do you mean by "initiatives"? Obama had some successes as a state senator--he is regarded as someone who was able to get bi-partisan support. Most of the successful laws that he sponsored were also sponsored by Republicans--so, I guess you would not call them "his." He participated in several successful issues: a campaign finance reform law, a requirement that homicide interrogations be taped, an anti racial-profiling law, an enhancement of tax credits for the working poor, increased child care subsidies, and worked on welfare reform. In all cases, I doubt that he did these things independently--but he was regarded as mildly successful, pragmatic, shrewd, and a person who worked as a bi-partisan. Again, your question is weasel-worded and cannot be answered as posed because no one knows what you mean by "his" or by "initiatives."
Why didn't George W. Bush? This group has been in existence since 2002 and opened its first academy in 2006. It is a charter school, not a private school. Obama is in favor of charter schools just like GW Bush was. He called for the expansion of innovative charter schools. Maybe it doesn't need to be "studied," just emulated and the program expanded. Again, this is a weasel-worded leading question that doesn't deserve an answer.
We are running out of money and something had to be cut; Obama showed that he was serious about cutting the budget by diverting research from hydrogen fuel cell to other more immediately viable clean tech. While this probably is short-term thinking at the expense of long-term thinking, the reason is already clear--because we have too little money and have to make some cuts. Was this a wise cut--maybe not. But, the reason is already clear.
Most of your "questions" are demands, both the demands and questions are frequently based on erroneous points, both the demands and questions are things that the garden-variety president generally wouldn't provide an "answer" to, and most of them are weasel-worded loaded questions--that's why nobody will answer. I'm just bored and passed some time looking up the rather obvious answers because it distracted me from feeling ill--sorry for taking up everyone's time and feeding the troll.
So says owncoffin.
I wouldn't trust any married man that was having an affair. Not in a business relationship or something as sacred as the nation's trust.....the trust that he is NOT a cheat and NOT a liar. If he would drag his wife and children through the mud just to satisfy his animal instincts what would he do to those as inconsequential as the American people?
Presidential candidates love to parade their families in front of the public. Why??? They have NOTHING to do with the man's ability to lead the nation! The reason is to convince the public that the man is stable in marriage and family life and can be trusted to care for the nation as much as he cares for his family.
And, just because Jefferson did it over 200 years ago doesn't make it right.
G Washington cheated his men and officers out of good land that had been granted them after the French Indian wars. Who ever thought there was ever ethics when considering our politicians?
beanathome You took all that time to make up that nonsense?
I work from home and have fun, messing with you liberals who make no sense and provide no answers to difficult questions and run on and on with no facts or statistics.
I worry about the country with these idiots running it. I want a safe and secure prosperous future for my children and grandchildren.
Ben Franklin repeated a very old truism
1/3 of the population will always vote liberal
1/3 of the population will always vote conservative
1/3 of the population is centralist and that is where an election will be fought.
The public has to be made aware of what the issues are and what the alternatives are.
And that is exactly what I am doing and will be doing.
beanathome How little you know.
In a debate or argument you can make statements and questions. The statements can be questioned. I can make a statement out of a question or a question out of a statement. It is my choice how I want to write something.
You give indefinite statements when I make definite demands. I know what schools Obama attended and I have on my desk folders with admission requirements and rejections rates and minimal acceptance criteria.
I have read quite a bit about the theories of how and why Obama got into Columbia and Harvard. Since they are not backed up with evidence, I ask for the transcripts to apply the information I have.
One does not get into Harvard Law school with a C average in college. Even you should know that. What were his LSAT scores? Did you know that less than 4% are admitted to Harvard Law School and do you know the minimum grade average and minimal Lsat scores required?
I have news for you Obama's transcripts are going to be a big problem for him. Romney already produced his tax returns and transcripts.
You can't use the word probably in an argument, you need to use facts that can be proved.
I have in my folder completely different and three definite sources. Don't try and squirm out of proper debate format.
Wright does not have a job with the White House on Obama's orders? Then you better tell Obama that as he just discussed his Pastor and the special job for Wright with reporters.
Why is the president of the United States being such an example as allowing his relatives to enter and live illegally in the U.S.?
Not what was written about his mother and his step father. Obama's grandparents didn't want to accept Obama. They had to as his mother sent him away. Check the documents. All that back and forth and moving, must have produced a very troubled young man. Are you sure you want this deceived, betrayed, confused man without a father figure and learning that his mother hated his father and his father was a bigamist as president?
You do know that Obama's father was on the verge of being expelled from the U.S. And Harvard finally asked the immigration authorities to remove him?
I am not asking about Bush, I am asking about your hero and the concept it was ordered a kill mission from the start.
You are so ridiculous. 24 hours more was only need to confirm DNA.
Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin all had doubles.
Talk to the average man on the street and they don't believe your b.s.
There are several souces that disagree on his degree from Columbia and since you don't have a copy of his transcript and a copy of what degree he got, what you say can not be determined as proof.
Obama's father was kicked out of Harvard. More lies to add?
You don't know Obama's history in the Illinois state senate? Then go some reseach and find out if any of the initiatives he proposed were ever enacted. You better go back and get your facts checked. Nothing he initiated was passed. That he voted for some issues that were passed is different from getting initiatives passed that he proposed.
I send this part first.
Walkingman - I want to know why you write lie after lie and think people will believe you. You have written nothing factual but clearly morons will believe the myths you spout. How sad you have to make all of this garbage up. It clearly says so much more about you than it does about President Obama. And, what it says about you is not good.
Lmao........ PartyOn walkingman! Nothing like Old Ben for a good quote!
Actually I think this news article was written so Walkingman could spout his hysteria and lies. Gives him a format to prove that intelligence isn't required to type LONG tirades made up in the imagination of one person. So - it has served it's purpose!
You have no idea how laws are enacted and I am not going to take time to teach you.
Study the requirements for the State of Illinois Senate and learn. Then go to where all the laws are registered and who sponsored the first initiative to present the proposal.
I am talking about a school in Obama's home town, he should know and care about.
Education is the greatest gift that society gives to a person. Chicago has a 45% drop out rate and less than 4% of public high school students go to college.
It is private compared to public school. If you call them up and talk with them you immediately find out why they are successful and how easily the system can be applied to the public school system when the right pressures and demands are made upon the failing systems now in existence.
You have to learn to read. The public school system is a failure and there are 20 more private, charter and religious schools that send all their graduating seniors to college.
Education should be no. 1 on the president's agenda. You pass it off like the rest of the blow hard statements you make.
You know nothing about hydrogen fuel and make vaporous statements about its promise.
Take the 3 billion dollar payout to unions to buy their votes for 2012 and put it into hydrogen fuel research. Cut the congressional budget. Cut the waste on any of a thousand projects.
Get back the 500,000,000 that Obama gave the Finnish car company to compete against the GM electric car.
Make up multimillion dollar prizes for coompanies that produce results. That worked before.
I am certain that if you mention hydrogen fuel to Obama he will say huh?
A fuel that will replace all imports, replace gasoline, diesel, natural gas and coal is just written off because the president is too incompetent to know its future?????
You do make me laugh with all the stupid statements you make.
SeekingSanity Just take a few minutes of your valuable time and do some research and prove to me what I lied about. You made the libelous statement now back it up.
jollyoldsoul1 Actually it was Benjamin Franklin that made the comment famous, but research shows it goes back to the old Roman Republic days.
SeekingSanity I seemed to have irritated your liberal soul by researching the feet of clay of your hero. I know I draw blood when I get a libelous baseless attack from a liberal.
walkingman1 - I don't have to back up my statements about the stupidity of your posts - no one believes your ranting and raving. The stupidity of all of your posts is pathetic! Obama headed Harvard Law Review - he earned it and none of your lies can change that. In fact - your entire posts are all lies. Not worth dealing with someone as sad as you! Go make up more "facts."
Oh yeah and don't forget:
Vitter, Sanford, Ensign, Schwarzenegger,Bruce Barkley, Randy Hopper, Paul Stanley,
Mike "your dripping out of me" Duvall,
Matthew Joseph Elliott (former Romney aide convicted with sexual exploitation.....of a child)
Vito Fossella,
The tap dancer Larry Craig,
Richard Curtis,
Mark Foley (Boehner's homeboy who he tried to help cover his crap)
Jim West
and the recycler himself Newt Gingrich
the list continues but I have a life to tend to.
SeekingSanity You believe them! You object to them. If they are so stupid and baseless, they will fall of their lack of reason.
Obama was awarded the honorific title of head of Harvard Law Review along with 80 other students. He was elected. He did not publish one article during his term at Harvard.
It is similar to joining a fraternity. If you are allowed in, you get in. It is spelled how in an article how the selection was made.
This is so typical Democrat hidden smut. The most crooked sick bastards become Democrats. The whole time sticking for women's rights while they are looking up their dresses. How embarrassing their party has become.
Notice how the socialist liberals turn on women and degrade them when they speak out against one of the Democratic good ole boys. As Rush would say "Liberal Hypocrisy at its best."
I believe everyone would love to listen to the same theology that Obama listened to for over 20 years from his Pastor Wright:
Jeremiah Wright was a committed Marxist, as he himself confirmed in an address in September 2009: “My work with liberation theology, with Latin American theologians, with the Black Theology Project and with the Cuban Council of Churches taught me 30 years ago the importance of Marx and the Marxist analysis of the social realities of the vulnerable and the oppressed who were trying desperately to break free of the political economics undergirded by this country that were choking them and cutting off any hope of a possible future where all of the people would benefit."
When Obama became a member of Trinity Church in 1991, he accepted what the church calls “the Black Value System,” a race-based code ethics that black Americansto shun the middle class life as a white trap, and to patronize only black-owned businesses. As Jeremiah Wright put it, “We are an African people, and remain true to our native land, the mother continent.”
"The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a … law, and then wants us to sing God bless America, no no no, not God bless America, GOD DAMN AMERICA, it’s in the Bible, killing innocent people.…."
Shocked? I am! Obama spent 20 years in this indoctrination and wanted to be president of a free multicultural democratic society?
what is extremely funny is that none of you in the "puritans make me sick" and "who cares" crowd would be upset if your dads were dropping their trousers for the young hottie at work...hahaha...your moms should just accept it as "no big deal" and "it's what men do"...hahaha...laughable
Speaking of Benjamin Franklin - I wonder what he would have to say about this article... ?
As soon as I saw the headline containing the words, JFK and affair, I immediately thought, why now, why all these years later? Then I thought, money. She must be doing this for money.
Then I read, "In her soon to be released memoir, Once Upon a Secret: My Affair with President John F. Kennedy and its Aftermath..." BINGO !
"list continues but I have a life to tend to."
is blogging on the library computer a "life"?...interesting
Jo-An-4354969 Simple, Obama is an unqualified to be president as Jack Kennedy was. Old Joe Kennedy wanted a son to be president and spent millions greasing the skids in Illinois and Texas. Johnson was selected as vice presidential candidate to deliver Texas and Daley was paid millions to hold back the Chicago vote until late in the morning the next day to know how many votes he had to deliver to put Illinois electoral vote in the Kennedy column.
Nbc has self promulgated that it is a liberal mouthpiece and Rex Holm and I object to wasting top headline space on a 50 year old piece of fluff instead of going after Obama for all the shi* he is pulling and has pulled.
Obama will be known as America's Chamberlain.
#1.53 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 3:43 PM EST
I think the connection has to do with both Obama and Kennedy having the luxury of getting the Lame Stream Media to cover-up and hide their weaknesses. It's no secret that Obama is jealously protected by the Liberal Media-At-Large.... just as it is no secret that JFK (The Camelot Years) was also coddled and protected. JFK was and idiot, God rest his perverted soul, but at least he served his country, even if he was a protected rich kid, ala J.F. Kerry (yet another womanizer, but at least Kerry went for the big buck, and not just the desert tray between her legs.
I can't begin to comprehend the number of liberal democrats, or at least what appear to be comments made by liberal democrats (sorry if the term offends you), that are/were unaware of the fact that JFK was a womanizing man-whore. I'm even more perplexed that they seem to have had no idea JFK (The Camelot Presidency) was coddled and protected by the liberal lame steam media. Kids, my, my, my, your degree of ignorance and/or denial is simply incredible to say the least. Especially given the nasty, hateful, ruthless comments and attacks many of these same liberal democrats unleashed on Herman Cain for his alleged affairs. Boy the media sure played those up big-time, and he wasn't even a public servant, working on the Tax Payer's nickle.
Not even Ted Kennedy (who surely never made it a quarter of the way to the Gates of St. Peter) was as bad, as big brother JFK. Shoot, even if Herman Cain's alleged affairs were all true x 10, that still wouldn't come close to the number of infidelities either of these Kennedy's had committed. Herman Cain's not even in the same league as either of those 2 womanizing man-whore, career politicians... and that's the honest truth. Still in denial, try doing a web search on "Ted Kennedy and Mary Jo", or "JFK Adultery", do this just to get a sneak peek into what those perverts were capable of, while they were in office.
So many young voters to educate, so little time. Nov. 2012 is just around the corner.
Well, Democrats never apologize for being sex maniacs and womanizers and wife cheaters. The Republicans however run on a campaign of straight arrows, family values, blah blah blah. So Conservatives/Repubs deserve any lambasting from liberals/Democrats when it comes to getting caught with their pants down. And even more so when it comes to gay affairs. I'm a Con/Repub and can fully understand that. And rightfully so. The lib's point is not disputable there.
Anyway, moving the conversation forward regarding bringing up Obama, the American Thinker says it best about where we are three years later:
---
very time you challenge Democrats on the bad shape of the economy three years (and $5 trillion) into Barack Obama's presidency, you get hit with something like "when Obama came into office, the economy was so bad," etc.
So let's remember exactly how things were when Obama came into office.
When Obama came into office, the Democrats concluded two years of controlling both the House and Senate for the first time in over a decade. Until they showed up, everything was quite all right. All hell broke loose after their anti-business policies started kicking in, and things became worse when the Democrat won the White House, too.
When Obama came into office, he didn't show up as a sitting governor. Instead, he was a voting member of the majority party in the Senate -- the majority party, remember, who created the mess -- and he only made things worse once in the White House. See for yourself:
...When Obama came into office, the economy had just concluded a year of 0.0% growth. In Obama's first year, however, the economy shrank by 3.5%.
...When Obama came into office, we had a mess due to the housing market. However, the worst year for new home sales in U.S. history took place in Obama's third year, not Bush's last.
...When Obama came into office, we concluded Bush's worst year of banks closings under Bush, with 25 banks shuttered in 2008 due to insolvency. Obama's best year of bank closings (2011) saw 97 banks go under.
...When Obama came into office, the economy had just concluded a year that lost 1.4 million fewer jobs than what the economy lost in Obama's first year.
...When Obama came into office, we had concluded a year (2008) where the unemployment rate was on average 5.8% for the year. The best UR month on Obama's watch is above eight percent.
When Obama came into office, we were losing a half a million jobs a month. However, just as the waters in New Orleans started receding before Bush did anything, jobs losses in the U.S. were bound to recede even if Obama did not lift a finger. The only question was how fast jobs would come back.
A rule in modern economics suggests that the steeper the downturn, the faster the comeback. But even if you look only at Obama's "good" job months (largely since we elected a do-nothing Congress which by default tied and limited Obama's hands...), the job gains are less than what President Ford -- with an economy and population 35 years smaller than now -- delivered at this time following the steep downturn of the mid-1970s, and it's a drop in the bucket compared to what Reagan gave us after the steep 1981 downturn.
When Obama came into office with an economy of 133.5 million non-farm jobs, his economic team projected that at the end of 2010, we would have 137 million of those jobs if we were to follow Obamanomics. However, at the start of the current year, we had fewer than 133 million jobs -- which is four million jobs short of what we were supposed to have a year ago!
Finally, when Republican President Warren Harding came into office in early 1921, the economy was in a depression, with GDP (then called GNP) being down almost four times more than the recent downturn. However, when Harding concluded his third year in office after pushing through steep tax cuts, the unemployment rate was lower than the pre-depression levels despite the fact that more people came into the workforce. Now, by contrast, despite millions giving up on looking for jobs, the unemployment rate is still higher than "when Obama came into office."
In brief, things might not have been exactly hunky-dory when we got Obama...but they're a heck of a lot worse now that we have him.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/when_obama_came_into_office.html#ixzz1legZvyxz
---
Jhawke
Well, Democrats never apologize for being sex maniacs and womanizers and wife cheaters.
============
Let's see. First, the rethugli-con party is the family value party. I know this as they've screamed it in our faces for many, many years. It's ok for Sarah Palin to stand on their stage telling us about family values, right? Not with her under aged, unwed, pregnant daughter by her side. Karry Craig soliciting in an airport restroom? Hum, the good people of Idaho would've reelected him if he had run again. You cons screamed bloody murder when Elliott Spitzer was caught with a prostitute, demanding he resign, which he did, but have no problem reelecting David Vitter, rethugli-con Senator from LA. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. Niether does your stupidity.
walkingman1---you should've quit while you were behind. You lost the first round and have been sinking ever since. Don't like this site. Take your drivel and go back to Faux Noise. You're a natural there.
He was just another powerful person who felt entitled to do whatever he wished. She was incredibly dumb if she thought he cared a whit about her. It was just sex, girl and don't forget it or try to rationalize that it was love.
To presume to know whether or not JFK had feelings for her is the ultimate arrogance. He kept it going for 18 months. If he just wanted sex, he could have had anyone he wanted (and did). And even if sex was the thing, that does not preclude his caring about her. To say so is ridiculous.
To think how Clinton was under such long attack for his intern-affair, while it was something that was going on all along with his predecessors is a shame. The times changed — nothing is secret anymore. Who really cares who they sleep with? Powerful men do this. So what?
disabled vet 1; I couldn't have said it better...
It's good to be the king! JFK. Ted Kennedy. Henry VIII.
JFK and Clinton were both sexual predators since they both picked young girls that were in vulnerable positions. This woman and Monica both greatly admired these men and both thought they were loved to some extent. This is childlike fantasy.
The POTUS should not be having affairs, and should not be sexually pursuing young girls. This is disgusting behavior, dangerous in that blackmail could be used, and frankly a very poor example when a good example is desperately needed in the US. Obama scores well with setting a family example. He seems to like being around his girls and wife. I hope so. I think so.
I loved the spirit of JFK and I voted for Clinton and so my wrath isn't party related. It is a moral call - period.
Gabriella,
You're the reason women are treated like objects. I'd like to see how you'd react if your husband did this.
Powerful men, especially the president, should be expected to act in a moral way, just like everyone else. In fact, it's more important for the president, since he sets an example. Say what you will about Obama, but as far as we know, he's been faithful to his wife. There's something to be said for that.
Gabriella - You should care who they sleep with as it speaks to their moral fiber. A single man sleeping around is one thing, a married man cheating is quite another. How can a man lead a family let alone a nation if he (or she) has so little self discipline? How do we take a man/woman at their word when we know they don't back it up? And that's all we have when a politician runs for office - their word about what they are going to do when they get there.
Better wake up and take a look around, I think the exceptions to the rule would be the Presidents who DIDN'T have a fling while in the Whitehouse.
Like Gingrich? Disabled vet.
Mimi was hot, I would have banged her too – JFK was Da Man!
Well at least the male Democrat officials go for the women. Republican officials seem to go for men so go figure.
Despicable... JFK has long departed. Why continue the smear to the man's legacy?
Fed Up --- The truth is never a smear.
dasvet
HUH??? Gingrich was speaker of the house? WTF are you talking about?
You are all despicable, trying to link something that isn't even true(probably) to someone is vile and evil. That goes to everyone, I may be a conservative, but I am sometimes disgusted by my own party.
Listen and you hear 1 truth in 1000 lies.
If they had walked around behind him with a blacklight; he left a rather large trail of "smears" behind as legend has it.
The fact that people are shocked by the depravity of mankind's nature is highly amusing.
Consider your own hearts and lives; what's different?
You expect more from people in high places than you do of yourselves? And that's PRECISELY what's wrong with this world.
I expect more of myself than I do any other human being.
Now for a completely different way to look at it.
I find it amazing how having sex with someone is the indicator of all that they do in the rest of their life. Because we are intelligent human beings we aren't supposed to succumb to natural urges. You are a bad person if you have multiple partners but not if you are single??? Seriously? So if we had a President that was single and turned the White House into a gigolo bachelor pad that would be okay because he is single.
Keep religion out of it and as long as it is consensual what is it humans are doing wrong? If you cheated on your spouse then your spouse may choose to leave. Other than that, what other punishment is the correct punishment? Should we have them fired from their jobs? Take away their drivers license? Let's just throw the good for nothing POS in prison.
It was an 18 month affair--- Mrs. Kennedy had no clue whatsoever that this was going on? She is married to the most powerful man in the world and doesn't realize he is dipping his toe in the neighbors pool for a year and a half?
Power and money is rewarded with special privileges. It has been this was since the first man claimed they were in charge and it will happen until the human race no longer exists. Keep treating it like a club and they will act like club members.
You're talking about the mindset of a teenager (at the time). She cannot be blamed for being naive at that age.
Is the old gal that lonely, or that desperate to get her name in the history book! there is nothing special about her except she was the third floor maid , Kennedy humped everything that didn't jump out of his way! its a family tradition the wives were all trained by Mother Kennedy to look the other way! one thing tho she survived most women that had affairs with the Kennedy's OD ed, Drowned, or had a run in with a golf club or something fatal. The fact that she is alive proves this is all make believe where are the dirty clothes.
True. But she is a mature adult now and there is no reason to be writing a tell-all book about her past. The fact that her naive mistakes involve a president of the United States screams money and short-lived fame.
So what? There's no law against that. It's what we do in this country, if you haven't noticed.
Browns Backer
"as long as it is consensual what is it humans are doing wrong"
feel like sharing your moms address?....after all "it's what people do"...thanks in advance
who wants to take a boat ride with the macho man.
Has everyone missed the part where she was picked up in a limo and flown to DC? Sounds like misuse(theft) of public property and funds to me.
This women looks like she could of been pretty hot when she was in her day, but that wasn't when she was with Kennedy. She admits to loosing her virginity to him, so basically he molded her for what he liked in the sack and it wasn't til she got away from him and was with someone else that she just might of been a little firecracker. Hey don't get me wrong, she still looking good right now, she aged real well. I was just wondering how much fun she was and even the president might of been. You know Marilyn was a firecracker and she rocked Kennedy like he's never been before or after. Oh yeah that was one hot women there. He was a lucky man.
K. Snider, I think the only reason she wrote the book was because she was outted several years ago. There was a 37 word mention about an affair that went for a year and a half with an intern. The New York Daily News printed her name. She was not going to say or wrtie anything until that occured.
Harry Blank, what makes you think that Backers mom would want anything to do with you, just because its what people do? Once she sees you, she might not want to take a number two on your thing, see what I mean. Just because its what people do dosen't mean that everyone wants to do it with you. Your a loser to write something like that. Shame on you. Disgusting.
Mercury, thats exactly why she did that. Why wait for peoples lies to come out, she writes the book, tells all and then you make up your mind up on what was right or wrong and not someone elses opinion.
Browns Backer
The issue isn't a person's multiple sexual partners while married; it's the lack of self-control in face of their own selfish wants. If a person isn't going to be faithful and true to the oaths they took at their marriage ceremony, why would they honor the oaths and obligations they took up when they assumed office? This is why the USA is in the condition it's in. Elected officials are placing their own agendas and desires ahead of their constituents. It doesn't matter whether its sex, money, favors for friends, or keeping their privileged positions; when public servants are willing to betray their oaths and obligations for the convenience of the moment they show that they can't be trusted to stay the course.
If you're going to betray one oath, what does it matter if you betray another?
Hey - hey hey!! There's been quite a lot of busy little boys in the White House who seem to have had difficulty keeping their ol' peckers in their pockets:
Thomas Jefferson (Dem-Rep) President from 1801-1809,
Warren Harding (Rep) President from 1921-1923,
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Dem) President from 1933-1945,
Dwight D. Eisenhower (Rep) President from 1953-1961,
John F. Kennedy (Dem) President from 1961-1963,
Lyndon Baines Johnson (Dem) President from 1963-1969,
Bill Clinton (Dem) - who was President from 1993-2001,
*** Ms. Alford's relationship with JFK was first published in the Kennedy biography An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917–1963 by Robert Dallek, published in 2003. It had previously been confirmed in substance by Kennedy press aide Barbara Gamarekian in oral memoirs transcribed by the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum.
Guess it must make Ms. Alford feel really good to realise that she was just another of his myriad "dalliances"!!
Wham!! Bang!! And thank you ma'am!! NEXT Please!!
Mac5226, consider your analysis applied to Richard Nixon. Definitely an intelligent and capable president, but also one with serious ethical failings. But 100% faithful. He's a good counterexample to the prudish hyper-focus on sexual ethics to the exclusion of others. Some would say Lyndon Johnson's actions vis a vis Vietnam were far more consequential than any affair - he made decisions that directly caused thousands of deaths. Your obsession with sexual mores is terribly myopic.
@Joe
you proved my point...thanks
it's all good as long as it's not one of your libbie "free love" mothers or fathers...interesting
@MG71
"who wants to take a boat ride with the macho man."
would that be from Jay Heckman?....that is some funny stuff
who cares about who banged who 50 years ago. are you kidding me, must be a real slow news day.
National Enqirer and a gazillion of their readers and about 75 other TV shows......other than that...............nobody..................
IT seems to me the vast majority of folks will go all day everyday on a gossipy tidbit, American Idol (when people embarrass themselves), TV court shows, jerry springer type shows. SO I believe the network calculated correctly that a so called news story of a President in an affair with a 19 year old is a big story to the average reader. They'll probably do well with this. IT's more important than jobs, and wall street corruption, more important than internationals relations and trade policy. And more popular too !
That JFK had affairs is not news. Why this woman feels compelled to 'tell her story' at this late date leaves me wondering. And, frankly, I would have hoped for better from Brian Williams and Rock Center, which bills itself as a news show. If gossip is news, well.......
Ireadyou, I surely hope you are wrong on this one, but I fear that you are correct. What a sad commentary on 'what makes the world go round' these days.
IReadyyou---it makes for an interesting look into the American psyche. Most of this ADD society has been created and molded by the media to do their bidding. Even looking at politics what gets reported on, not political views but instead affairs, how much taxes they paid etc...... who truly talks politics anymore??
pjw-708550----if you read the entire story, she wrote the book only after she was called out because of another book written. If she wasn't identified maybe she doesn't write the book but once she was why wouldn't she capitalize on it? A legal buck is a legal buck no matter how you make it.
All I know is that my google bar on top of the screen is missing for me right now and that stinks. I miss it and I'm just hoping I can get it to come back for me. How about this women and Kennedy, I just might have to get this book to read the juicy details of that affair. I wouldn't mind hearing what presidents are like in the sack, lol. I guess I figure them to just lay there and they have the women go gaga over them. Know what I mean? I guess I could never be president if thats true.
So a married politician is screwing around with an intern or hooker....this is new???
More power to them, as long as their screwing them the aint screwing me....")
I agree. How could this possibly be interesting to ANYBODY ? It was ages ago. A very pathetic way to look for fame. She should be embarrassed; instead, she is boasting. tsk tsk
Thats the reason why Dubya was starting all the wars and screwing the nation all up, he couldn't get any strange when he was in office and it pissed him off. I guess he figured he should get lucky while he's in office and he flubbed out, zilch, nil nothing, so he bombed everyone.
DisabledVet1: Every woman that has gone public about her relationships with JFK has expressed her belief that he "cared" for her, was kind and considerate. The women from his bachelor days, like the beautiful blonde Danish woman ole Joe chased off. Judith Exner wrote chapters about how well he treated her, loved her! Marilyn thought he would marry her after he left the White House! I expect the major reason he was so successful with women was because he had that sweet little way about him that made them feel very special -- that he was so attentive, that he cared for them. Some call it charm, but it's more than just that and it can't be taught, faked, or bottled and sold. Guys that weren't born with it, probably envy it and wish they could develop it.
@walkingman,
No one is ever completely satisfied when their candidate loses an election. Yet, we still move forward and put the past behind us. To dwell on things and rant and rave is not healthy. I didn't like how the 2000 election turned out, yet I still went back to work at my job as a member of the U.S. Navy and followed the orders of the President of the United States of America. I didn't question my orders, I didn't protest, I didn't leave behind my job and career aspirations. GWB was sworn in and he was my Commander-in-Chief. I continued to serve after Obama was sworn in for those very same reasons. I was an American and our political system had done it's work and elected someone new. There is always a shift from one party to the other.
Your condescending tone isn't one that inspires debate. It alienates people by putting them on the defensive, and nothing anyone says is going to change your mind or alter your perception of events because you are set in your ways. We all can point to things that upset us in our political beliefs. Here are some of my problems with political talking heads:
1. Why does GWB get a pass on his service as an Air National Guard pilot and Al Gore and John Kerry are torn down when they actually served in Vietnam...not just during Vietnam. Bush seemly never had to report for much of his drill time nor serve in-country in Vietnam ("Thanks Dad"). When a respected news man (Dan Rather) approached this topic he was doggedly attacked and his patriotism questioned, forced into retiring. What did GWB have in his records that they didn't want anyone to see?
2. Why does Dick Cheney get a pass on his seeking deferement from the draft during Vietnam, and then come back years later as some bastion of the military establishment as SecDef and then claim unprecented powers as VP? Doesn't it seem odd that the man asked to oversee the VP nomination process nominates himself? A little self-serving isn't it?
3. Isn't it odd how Bush/Cheney's first reaction in the Florida 2000 electoral fight was to fight to manipulate the legal system to suppress recounts in district that experienced difficulties with the ballots? Why didn't they want to wait to see what the will of the people was?
4. Why were Bush/Cheney (or let's be real...Cheney) so emphatic about attacking Iraq so quickly after Iraq? No clear or credible evidence existed that the Saddam was in any way involved, yet plans were made rapidly to invade? Is it coincidence that Cheney was heavy into oil/construction or is it convienience?
5. What happened to the billions of dollars that went missing in Iraq?
6. How could the military masterminds of Bush/Cheney so poorly understand the situation with the Iraqi army and the Iraqi populace. "They'll greetus as liberators". Really? When the Iraqi army was disbanded what did you think they would do with themselves in a nation that was already in poor economic straights after years of enforced no fly zones and embargo? Did they think that they would just sit at home and quietly disagree with the Shia and other sects that had been at each others throats for decades? What a Republican Guard commander to do when he no longer has a military chain of command to adhere to? I know...Jihad! Bush/Cheney spent as much time on that military/political/religious analysis as they did on the evidence (or lack of) for WMD.
7. Obama's transcripts...what about Dubya's? I'd like to know what kind of grades he got at Harvardto earn an MBA. He attended Yale before that. Why would he have transferred from one Ivy League school to another so quickly? Was he forced to leave or did his Skull and Crossbones secret society activities force him to transfer? He said he was an average student, which to me means a "C" student (taken from standard grading scales). You can probably earn your MBA from a C average, but let's be honest...do you want your president to be an average student or I don't know...head up the Harvard Law Review?
8. I'd like to know what illegal drugs GWB used in his lifetime. Why won't he tell us? We know he lost his driving priviledges for about two years for driving while intoxicated. What else was he using?
9. Why didn't anyone raise a ruckus about John McCain being born on foreign soil but they doggedly refuse to accept Obama as a valid U.S. citizen? Hawaii was a U.S. state at least, unlike McCain in the Panama Canal Zone...a territory(Hypocrites)
10. Sarah Palin...................seriously?
11. Obama didn't serve in the military but according to the Constitution, you don't have to be. Roughly 20 or so presidents have actually served in the military during wartime and a handful of others during peacetime. It's not a requirement, but neither is lack of service reason for ineligibility. Civilian leadership overseeing the military is one of the key factors that distinguishes us from a Banana Republic where the military is more interested in maintaining political power than serving the will of the people.
12. Why do Republicans presidential candidates cling to the bsurd proposition that you absolutely cannot ever raise taxes on the rich, but it's OK to ask the middle class or low income workers to accept lower wages and more cuts in benefits? When you have a problem paying your bills, you do two things to get by (a temporary solution)....you reduce your expenditures (cut spending on luxuries or non-essentials) and get part time job (raise more revenue). You praise Reagan but you ignore the fact that he raised taxes. So did Bush Sr. Is it really the end of the world to restore taxes to the level they were (what is it...a for, maybe five percent difference)? I don't don't harbor any ill will against someone who's used brains, determination, grit, and ingenuity to make a better life for themselves. That's the American dream. But the American dream should be open to everyone, and more and more it seems like the have's have the deck stacked against the have not's ever being able to realize the American Dream.
13. People get all up in arms about Obama bowing respectfully to other heads of state. Yeah...well Bush held hands and kissed an Arab...albeit one of his rich Saudi Shiek friends. Bush bowed head head to a world leader or two as well. In fact, in Japan he puked all over the Prime Minister. Also, in Japan, Obama's bow was appropriate according to protocol and did not meet the criteria for the prostrating, subservient bows that exist in Japanese society when meeting the Emperor. Plus, at least Obama has never man-handled the female Prime Minister in Germany like Bush did. Talk about awwwwkwarrrrd.
Just my observations. You can tear it down in your typical sneering fashion. It won't matter, because I believe what I believe and you believe what you believe and that too is part of the American dream. The only difference betwen you and I is that I accept that people have a right to their views instead of calling them silly names and blaming them for all the wrongs in the world.
What a great thoughtful well-written piece that clearly defines how you feel about the current state of things. How the heck does it apply to a comment section about a fifty year old affair an intern had w/JFK or am I reading it wrong?
It was a rebuttal to walkingman above, who started down this path.
Why is she telling this thing now? Just low class.
it's an election year and one of the republicans has been accused of multiple affairs. What better way to take the heat off of him than to go "Oh look! A Democrat had an affair, too!" next we'll be hearing how Jimmy Carter lusted after rabbits or something like that. Plus it makes her some money.
Exactly - why do this now and cause further pain to the only surviving child of President and Mrs. Kennedy. And shame on this woman particularly - all the 19 year old girls I knew were well aware that an affair with a married man was not moral - no matter who he was. I hope no one buys this book.
You really don't know? It's called Book $ales.
Huh?!-- With all due respect....huh? So, the Republicans are responsible for leaking this article to protect Newt by slinging mud at a dead president?
Wow-- healthy fantasy life, you have.
When Clinton dies, women from all over the world will come out to say they once had an affair with Bill. Most likely they will be telling the truth. JFK was the same, and cut from the same cloth.
This woman didn't choose to time to tell her story based on party, but timing. She is old and has decided to get that weight off her shoulders and fess up. Equally she wants her 1 minute of fame and so she will get it.
I personally think some things are better left unsaid. They can be taken to the grave.
Huh! - REALLY - I am rather sure that this lady did not plan to write a book, pub the book and get on the interview circuit in the last 2-3 weeks since Newt goned some numbers in race. Kennedy is always a big story and WILL always be a big story. For money or for her own reason it does not matter. I know for sure - it is not becasue Rep. are trying to take the heat off Newt...BTW they are not "acusations" of Newt. He has admitted to the affairs and I am rather sure he did not lie under oath to cover his own butt like Prez Clinton did.
Everybody KNEW Kennedy had an affair with Marilyn MONROE, what's the big deal about THIS one?
What's the big deal about Gingrich? btw, I agree with you, Veteran.
its called confession. getting ready to meet thy maker. no sin gets into heaven. if your not a beleiver, i can only say that i have no doubt we all have 1 Creator. i call mine by the Name of Jesus Christ
Michael --- Why now? I dunno, but I'm guessin'!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>MONEY !!!
Sorry but "low class" is a married man/woman who actively seeks out sexual encounters outside of his/her marriage. But I guess marriage doesnt mean much to you....
One reason why she is telling this now--MONEY
Did you read the last paragraph? An author outed her several years ago. She briefly acknowledged at that time, now a book is written.
Alright... so far we have Obama, Newt and God weighing in on this article... now if someone can just find a way to incorporate Luke Skywalker this thread will be COOMPLETE!
Just another delusional old lady looking to make a buck.
Ah, the left loves to be in denial.
Delusional? The affair is verified you fool.
Verified by who? You?
Did you read the entire article, Rick, or just skip down to comments bashing?
Exactly...why come out with this and cause further pain to the only surviving child of President and Mrs. Kennedy? And shame on this woman herself particularly - most girls I knew at that age were well aware that an affair with a married man was not something a moral person did. I hope no one buys this book.
Lets pretend we all had affairs with dead celebs and write books about it .
A Monica Lewinsky wannabe ..
Arwen - why are you putting any blame whatsoever on her? 19?!?!?! I bet you blame Lewinksi for bobbing Clinton's cigar dont you? A moral person would not have sought out a 19 yr old to cheat on his wife with as he was married.
Ray - I dont think she was pretending. If you read the article it was confirmed a long time ago. She just finally broke her silence.
Would you say that if she were your mother?
dman, what you are quoting says that she confirmed it. That's good! Oh, and where precisely did I "bash" anyone?
It has nothing to with politics - Democrat or Republican - a man used his position of power to seduce and bed a subordinate, period. No justification - no "hey the other guy did, why can't I? Or this has been going on for years, so what's the difference? I don't care what the reason "he" gives. Plus the SOB did it it in his wife's bedroom! The ultimate insult to her and his marriage! Wrong is wrong, enough with the half assed justiifications everyone is coming up with. And as far as her "should have taken it to her grave" and "she is nothing is but a money grabbing slut ", what if it was your daughter? What if it was abuse? And this could be classified as that! With that mindset, any person who sues their abuser or the organization who he/she was part of is just looking for money or publicity! All of you want to clean up politics right up till it's time for your candidate to do the same then all of a sudden it's - that's the way it's always been. Wrong is wrong, simple.
This is so typical Democrat hidden smut. The most crooked sick bastards become Democrats. The whole time sticking for women's rights while they are looking up their dresses. How embarrassing their party has become.
Notice how the socialist liberals turn on women and degrade them when they speak out against one of the Democratic good ole boys. As Rush would say "Liberal Hypocrisy at its best."
Raymond1126037--
So does the Right--are you that ignorant???????
(Obviously the answer is YES.)
Mosin....Look at how conservative, Family Values Republicans rant about the evilness of gays, while they're cruising airport men's rooms.
Arwen, you do know that Carolyn and even her late mother knew about these affairs, don't you? While Carolyn didn't know at the time (she was too young), I am sure she learned by her teen years about her father. There were many articles written about these affairs. The Kennedy men were well known for them. As for Jackie, JFK cheated on her very early on. I listened when they had her tapes on tv. She may not have known about every affair, but she did know that he was not faithful to her.
One other thing. Unlike the media today, the media back then kept these stories hush-hush. It didn't matter what your political affiliation; they did not report these stories. Now a days, reporters trip over each other trying to get the infidelity scoop on a politician.
Lady you are no one special. Just one of hundreds if not more. He was an iconic manwhore and you were a forgotten name in no time. You were lucky if you didn't catch something nasty.
Ah, the ripe smell of money.
Just ask Herman Cain's women. Why are we worried about these private lives? but I guess with Cain, the racist just couldnt resist.
Whatev, honey...
Wow. She's still a good looking lady!
This female should just whither away into oblivion. And she's a grandmother of the sort , wow. Her mea coupa fails to impress me.Please remind her that the Oprah show is no more.
that's culpa-- mea culpa.
Maybe b helinski is talking about her car?
A Coupa DeVille?
This is so typical Democrat hidden smut. The most crooked sick bastards become Democrats. The whole time sticking for women's rights while they are looking up their dresses. How embarrassing their party has become.
Notice how the socialist liberals turn on women and degrade them when they speak out against one of the Democratic good ole boys. As Rush would say "Liberal Hypocrisy at its best."
Mosin,
Yes, the Dem's go after "women" while the Repub's go after "men in airport bathrooms" and "little boys", i.e.: "male pages"
Ditto heads! Gotta love em!
Puke
Mosin, I have heard stories that even DDE cheated on his wife. The media kept quiet about these things back in the day. It was also known that Congressmen of both parties pressured their pages for sexual favors.
As president, JFK was an intelligent and inspiring leader. As a husband, awful...just awful.
How was JFK "intelligent"? "Inspiring", yes, "intelligent" not-so-sure.
You really know nothing about he he was as a husband! That was up to Jackie to say, no one else. Mistresses were an accepted part of the package in her world. Your puritanical judgements are no reflection at all on the experience of those two people.
well, being a wholesale cheating husband would earn him "husband of the year" award, right? She just said "as husband" - not as human being, or a leader or whatever it is that you respect so much. Yeah - if some one burns the food every time they cook, they are an awful cook, no matter how great of a human being or professional they are - she was being specific
Sounds like he had a talent for picking women with exactly the same morals too. "I lost my virginity in the First Lady's bedroom." Sheesh.
As a notable figure once said: "Giggidy, Giggidy, Goo!".
Quagmire 2012.
Who cleaned up the bloody sheets? I think this woman is full of @!$%# and a liar. Anyone can make up a story years after the other party is dead. Just because someone here said the supposed affair was leaked to another author doesn't make it true.
Lucky we weren't married to him, isn't it?
Digging up a dead WWII hero to fling insults at him is low. Judging him by current mores is worse. Believe it or not, men and women admired that type of behaviour back then. Men who could attract women, even married men, were like James Bond: sought after and wanted for friends and companions.
Insulting his memory makes no sense, especially if you aren't old enough to remember a time when he was alive. If you don't you should sit on your hands and keep your keyboard quiet because you've no idea how times and people have changed from then until now.
Learn sociology, watch Mad Men or Pan Am or read some books. Culture changes over time. You may as well judge an aboriginal culture for being animistic.
Peridot, I was very young then, but old enough to remember JFK. I remember his assassination like it happened yesterday. Far from insulting his memory, I said JFK was an inspiring leader...a great president...but his indiscretions were horrible. J. Edgar Hoover knew all about them...one reason why JFK couldn't get rid of him. As for my "puritanical views," as expressed by Gabriella West, treating a spouse with dignity, loyalty and honesty are timeless. How puritanical is it to abhor the fact that JFK slept with an intern, who was not considered an adult at that time and also a virgin, in his wife's bed?
All - Mitterand head of France once said "A Strong leader has a strong Libido"
And I guess at least he did - when he died his three mistresses and his wife was at his graveside and nobody cared
You all have forgotten about Eisenhower with his female driver, FDR with his secretary, and on and on
So what - These indiscretions are between husbands and wives - only when they start to judge others for their same actions do I get angry
Kitti - she said "in the bedroom" - she didn't say "in the bed"...
Here's a scenario for all of you - "that's how men/society was back then" or the "everyone does it" or "it's something between a husband and a wife (skip over the fact the husband is the POTUS) - you sitting in the kitchen with your daughter (maybe your first and only daughter, your little princess) and she tells you she is seeing a man, a married man, who "just happens" to be the POTUS, that she lost her virginity to him on his wife's bed, who sends a car and plane to pick her up from school and bring her to Washington for more screwing! HOW WOULD YOU FEEL? Betrayed? Angry? Powerless? What are YOU going to do? Accuse the POTUS? A wildly popular and admired President! C'mon let's hear it! What do you say? What do you do? And HS, what if she got pregnant!
As far as it being between a husband and a wife - when you become the President and First Lady, you lose that priviledge when you get elected. And if being an adulterer is okay, where do you stop? Alcoholic? "Recreational" drug user"? Abuser of your kids? Hey come on! It's behind closed doors and between a husband and wife, right?
Seems to be an ongoing theme here with Democrats and White House interns.
Yea they learned if from the 'Pubs! Like the Gingrich school of loyalty where you keep them while young and healthy or in an affair and then ditch them when the vows come into play.
Yeah, Republicans like to stick to Congressional male interns, or cheating on their wives with illnesses... or picking up men in airport bathroom.. shall we go on?? lol
Finally, true bipartisanship!!!!
The big difference: the Democratic party makes no claims to 'Family Values' as do the Republicans.
People will do anything for money! Something that cannot be proven so this is only about money and fame!!
Why are you saying it cannot be proven? It was and IS proven. She was outed in 2003 by the book of a historian and the New York Time, idiot!
proven how? evidence? The New York Times is all of a sudden the pillar of excellent reporting? Facts please. What we do know is that a bright, 19 year old woman says she had s long term affair with the husband of another woman and somehow we should feel sorry for her while also allowing her to cash in. All pretty clear....just be willing to prostitute yourself for the media and the $ rolls in
@GabriellaWest: No reason to call someone who doesn't agree with you names. It makes your opinion seem worthless. Just sayin'.
Herman Cain is asking where you were 3 months ago.
@K. Snider So agree! People get butt-hurt when your opinions don't exactly match theirs.
GabriellaWest
Newt G is a historian so I guess you believe everything he says also! lololol Sarah palin wrote a book also so that must make it all true lololololol
Who cares. Why make a big deal about it know. Oh yeah, I forgot, book coming out, publicity needed, movie in the future?
Whether it is proven or not, it is totally irrelevant.
is this the only one jackie didnt find out about?
i wouldnt mind doin a couple of the wrinkles lol
Was it camelot or cumalot????
That's oh so funny...and oh so gross all rolled into one.
This woman should be ashamed of herself not flaunting her lack of respect for another man's wife in a tell-all book.
Fifteen minutes of fame surely isn't going to erase any "guilt" she may be feeling after all these years...I guess she thinks the dirty money she makes off the book and/or movie deal she gets will help her feel better about herself as a person?
Oh please . . .
why should SHE be ashamed of herself, while not a word on him. Come on, what 18 (!) year old would not feel flattered and obliged if the PRESIDENT she served and probably respected if not view him as almost "God" showed interest in her?
I say, if you wanna shame someone, SHAME HIM: to pray on 18 year old(s) at 45 and married AND the president of the country - could show more impulse control and respect for his wife and the people he lead
I know, he is all but "GOD" right now, but I could still see him as a failure in this regard - even before this "girl" showed up - clearly he didn't have a clue about how to restrain his adult impulses and you wanna blame a girl!
I doubt that money was as important as getting it off her chest - and for those who wants to judge - look at yourself first, there might be a thing or two to improve ;)
Snider,
You are too much. Kennedy pretty much raped this 19-year-old (she says she could not have resisted) and you blame the girl. This was a very immoral president.
Dan - the article says she wanted to be with him as well...she says he did not force himself on her or make her do anything she didn't want to do. That is not rape in her book - or in mine.
At any time she could have quit her job and left but chose to stay and continue the affair. She is not a victim - nor does she portray herself as a victim. She portrays herself as someone who needed to unburden herself with this memory - which she could have done with a psychologist. She didn't need a tell all book.
If this same situation happened with an unknown boss at a little company in nowhere town in Kansas there would be no book.
My point is that there is absolutely no good reason for having to "get this off her chest" in a public way.
I don't agree that I am "too much." On the contrary, I think I see it very clearly. But, I do agree, JFK was an immoral person and I think no better of him than I do her.
Dan, she says that if she had said no, he would have let her go. No rape involved. She was flattered and pleased. Most young girls would have been, and still ARE. It's the way the world works, my friend.
To me...this book is no better than someone saving...oh I don't know...their semen-stained blue dress...just in case she needed it later...for...I don't know...evidence or blackmail or something...to help make some money or something silly like that. Just sayin.
Exactly amir-5153029 - # 15.2
She knew he was a married man. Now,....where were her moral
values...It takes two to tango. ! !
I blame her for wanting to write a "tell-all" book this many years after it happened and saying she felt the need to unburden herself.
Do I believe that she was probably young and naive? Absolutely.
Do I believe even if she wanted to say "no" - which she clearly states she wanted to be with him - she would have been too afraid to say no to such a powerful person? Sure.
But she doesn't claim to be emotionally harmed by the situation...she only feels emotionally harmed by not telling her story. Big difference between the two.
If she came out with a story that she was raped and made to keep it a secret it might be a different story. But that's not what she is saying. This is nothing more than a play for attention and money.
I'd blame the guy who gave her a reason to write a tell-all book
I blame them both...no doubt, he was a puke of a man. But only one of them stands to make money off the book. The book isn't about him...it's about her and her feelings.
"Suze the Muze", apparently you like the current status quo. Perhaps you should step aside and allow women to make up their own minds whether they like being intimidated into sex or not.
I am always cautious when someone writes a book about someone who is not around to defend themselves. Just sayin - no one can contradict anything she says - how convenient. And, she hurts his daughter in the process. Well - no matter, at least SHE feels better! Yeah - right!
Sadly, I think she is rationalizing the situation that was pretty close to rape, just not to feel even worse - many of victims of sexual assault do
If you watch the interview and hear how she answers the question "if she felt overpowered" it is clear some protection mechanism kicks in and she switches it to something else - she doesn't know for sure what would have happened if she said "no" so she wants to believe in a better "scenario"
it is very common for ppl who were exploited by authority figures they held in high regard to avoid "reality" that way
You might be somewhat right about the first time being considered some sort of "rape" but for the next 18 months? Somehow I just don't buy that.
Who cares!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JFK was a pig. Period.
Exactly. Bay of Pigs.
so was jackie........ she was doing everyone too.
I'm begining to wounder if any of these polititions can keep their penus in the pants
penus? PENUS? Dear God.
wounder? polititions? penus? I have to assume English isn't your primary language.
Where you from JimBob....let me guess
Penus. Past tense of penis.
KevinH ... very funny!
Penus are from Venus. Or is it penus and popcorn?
Women are from Venus, penus are from Mars.
I'm going to have to destroy the Earth. It interferes with my view of Penus.
very cool, if I was president I certainly wouldn't have left a stain on an intern's dress! duh!
OK, so the conservatives were right all along about the Kennedy skank family Liberals were in denial about for decades. I guess conservatives are right about most of the things they say.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
John Kennedy WAS by most definitions a conservative. He cut taxes substantially and had a conservative financial agenda for the nation and as a conservative he further did not have the immediate inclination to jump into wars. There's a difference however between conservative and radical in that era. Goldwater was the militant bomb the piss out of the commies approach while Kennedy was not. Kennedy was ..."let's demonstrate that American democratic values and capitalism are the better way of life"... I am paraphrasing.
What became of the Kennedy legacy after 2 assassinations of brothers by what is more and more evidently orchestrated by radical militarists in our government, war profiteers and of course organized crime. This is essentially undeniable even considering the lone gunman theory of the Warren Commission.
No Kennedy wasn't a "skank" ... he was an old school misogynist who learned his behavior from the powerful men that came before him along with the acceptance of this behavior by old school women who were very religious.
kyot <<<<<>>>>> There is ABSOLUTELY no evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald, nor Sirhan Sirhan were anything but loose cannons, acting alone. If you have any evidence to the contrary, please publish it. BTW, "Because I said so." is not valid evidence.
what kind of circular thinking is that... hmmm, since the most famous recent dilly-dallys are let's see, Kennedy and Clinton, that makes "liberals" skanky and "conservatives" umm, right? Many conservative "leaders" have been caught with ze old pants down, Schwartzeneger for instance. For God's sake, please quit trying to make everything into an Obama-grinder, it really comes off sounding ... well, stupid.
I don't know what alternate reality you're in Maltilda, but there is tremendous evidence that John Kennedy was killed in an act of conspiracy. E. Howard Hunt confessed the plot to his own son on his deathbed. He was recorded and in fact also filmed or video taped by his son at his own direction!
http://www.rense.com/general76/hunt.htm
That Howard Hunt was a pervasive liar is not questioned. It's really a matter of ascertaining his motivations and who or what he was protecting. That there was "EVIDENCE" of a cover up, conspiracy etc... there is Absolutely NO DOUBT as the scramble to cover up went on for decades. They just could kill everyone that knew something. Maybe you should expand your repertoire.
More on Hunt and the EVIDENCE.........
http://www.saintjohnhunt.com/
kyot >>>>>>>>First off, I didn't say he didn't do it. I said the evidence that he did it does not exist. I've seen some of the mountains and mountains of so-called conspiracy theory. I believe them about as much as I believe in the tooth fairy.
Kyot, very interesting!
Like I said, Alternate reality. There's an old saying that happens to very concisely illustrate a simple Truth. "Even a delusional paranoid can have real enemies."
You can believe or not but it also matters not because YOU are your own reference point. My reference point has been "triangulated". I do not depend on my own "hunches" or arrogant misunderstandings.
stop bankrupting US - well of course they are! Let's see - Iraq has WMD's; Saddam Hussain was behind 9/11; shall I go on? Conservatives couldn't tell the truth if their lives depended on it!
This is so typical Democrat hidden smut. The most crooked sick bastards become Democrats. The whole time sticking for women's rights while they are looking up their dresses. How embarrassing their party has become.
Notice how the socialist liberals turn on women and degrade them when they speak out against one of the Democratic good ole boys. As Rush would say "Liberal Hypocrisy at its best."
Mosin:
Cut and paste much????
The mere fact that Rush is your God, makes you non credible! Bow to the Rush...Ditto heads! Duh.....
Right on Mosin.... all one has to do is listen to what Ted Kennedy used to do while at lunch when they would get drunk and hump their waitresses in the restaurant. And if that aint enough how about him killing his girlfriend and lying about it after. Or how about Barney Frank and the male whore house he had in his home. Yup, democrats are really pitiful, but the one in office now is the worse because he does not like America and wants to teach us a lesson. He is a socialist if you havnt figured that out yet, and he intends on turning this country into a socialist state controlled by the democrat party. Every thing he does brings us closer to his dream, and we have to get rid of him before this country is history. You dont sit and listen to "not God bless America, but God damn America" for 20 yrs and tell us that he didnt hear that........ he cant hide his communist and terrorist friends, and you cant hide his communist father, nor the marxist book he wrote. He is the enemy of this country and you had better believe it or we are finished.
might be jealousy...no interns willing to trip the light fantastic with these dour overly tanned conservatives...well, except Newt...but then he only gets those helmut haired interns...yikes!
Killer and Mosin... I have to ask, are you to be judged by your younger brother or cousin or associate? I for myself reject this notion and dredging up Ted kennedy whom I do see as a hypocrite, is not the last and final judgement of John Kennedy's legacy.
Ha ha.... now you want to lay off dems and their antics, huh???? Well all i have heard for the last almost 4 yrs now is George Bush anytime anyone questions obama and his socialism.... so when you libs start blaming obama for his hatred of the constitution and his march to socialism and his destruction of this country, i will stop making fun of a bunch of drunkards that abuse and rape women from the democrat party.
Whatever...we already knew JFK was a horndog.
He probably slept with numerous women while President. Will we be assaulted by memoirs from each one?
we can only hope
@Bart Conner: THANK YOU!!!!! Why does anybody even care about this?? What does this woman hope to gain by telling her "story"? What is going to do, sue the Kennedy Family??? HAHAHA. What a bunch nutty brown bs journalism. There are more important stories going on this country that need to be told and that ALL News stations should be looking into.
Seriously? I do not think that word means what you think it means. [/ Princess Bride]
assaulted
[uh-sawlt] Origin
as·sault
[uh-sawlt] Show IPA
noun
1. a sudden, violent attack; onslaught: an assault on tradition.
2. Law . an unlawful physical attack upon another; an attempt or offer to do violence to another, with or without battery, as by holding a stone or club in a threatening manner.
3. Military . the stage of close combat in an attack.
All one need do is avoid reading this book and this, too, shall pass.
The posthumous trashing of a WWII hero and dead President is tacky, to say the least. JFK was a flawed human being, just like the rest of us. One wonders what the rest of you have accomplished in your lives that you feel you can throw stones at a dead man's reputation.
If you didn't live through the Cuban Missile Crisis and never felt the fear of the Cold War you don't get to judge him, period. You've no idea what it was like then and none of you have a clue how times differ now.
Matthew 7:5
'You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brothers.'
You people trash every republican alive and dead and you now get a set of morals when it comes to one of your own democrat presidents? Sorry, they are fair game too, right along with your queer democrat Barney Frank that ran a male whore house out of his home... fair game my friend, and i dont give a @!$%# what they did while in office..... You people fawn all over Clinton while he was screwing everything walking past his office, and its a good thing he had a republican congress working for him, otherwise his term would have been a complete joke
Bart, that was impossible...... he was screwing everything in hollywood too...... I dont blame him though cause Jackie was doing the same thing.. that entire family was disfunctional.
A few of questions:
1. How hard did Chris Matthews push to get this story buried?
2. What was his reaction when he saw it? How long did it take to clean up the mess when he blew is gasket over it?
3. Is he going to smear her and say she is lying?
Oh please, Chris Matthews knows JFK had affairs! Everyone knows it! Jackie probably knew too!
No one cares, unless you are trying to impeach the president while calling yourself a "family Values" congressman and cheating on YOUR OWN WIFE!!
Well he could have at least cleared his conscience by asking Jackie for an open marriage.
Chris may know it but he's not too keen on discussing it out in the open. :-) he doesn't like it when people remind him of the fact that his deity was an adulterer.
Why should Chris talk about it?
Much better as Lady M say's:
LOL
Chris tingles in his Mimi outfit.
Sorry, but it wasn't caring for you when he encouraged you to sleep with another staffer. It was trading you off to another so he could get his next conquest.
Not exactly. Kennedy was watching at the time.
trading for favors maybe
sad... no one seems to care he did so much harm to that girl psychologically... :(
sometimes I am horrified on how ppl treat their young...
So much for the "dry-land" theory .....maybe it was too much chlorine and she became blonde...