By Jessica Hopper, Lauren Specter and Alexis Weiss
Rock Center
Frankie Probst, a young man mentored by former Penn State defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky, says Sandusky was like a father figure to him but grew increasingly clingy over a period of 8 years.
“We kind of grew apart because he was getting clingy, wanting me to come over and stuff," Probst told NBC's Natalie Morales in an exclusive interview broadcast Monday night on Rock Center.
“As I grew older, I did kind of think, it’s a little weird,” he said.
Probst, 24, met Sandusky when he was 10 years old through The Second Mile charity that Sandusky founded. Sandusky is currently free on a $100,000 bond after being charged with 40 criminal counts related to the alleged sexual abuse of eight minors over a 15 year period.
Probst said that he doesn’t know if Sandusky is guilty or innocent.
“That’s something a monster would do if it’s true,” Probst said.
In an exclusive interview with NBC's Bob Costas on Nov. 14, Sandusky said that he is innocent of the charges, but admitted to showering and having “horsed around” with young boys.
Between the ages of 10 and 16, Probst said that he spent weekends at the Sandusky home and would travel with Sandusky to NFL football games out of state.
“He was a down to earth, really nice guy that would do anything for you,” he said. “I guess he took a liking to me and the relationship grew to kind of like a fatherly figure.”
Probst said that Sandusky never abused him. He said that while he did stay frequently at Sandusky’s home, he never stayed in the basement bedroom that some of the alleged victims told investigators Sandusky used to molest them, according to the grand jury report.
Probst said that Sandusky never came into his bedroom at night and when they would travel out of state together, they’d sleep in the same room, but in different beds.
Probst eventually began to pull away from Sandusky when Sandusky began to demand more and more of his time. Sandusky was also volunteering as a football coach at Probst’s high school, so Probst was seeing Sandusky nearly every day.
“I wasn’t seeing my friends as much, wasn’t doing as teenagers do,” Probst said.
When Probst began to distance himself, Sandusky would pull him out of class to chat with him. The chats eventually turned into arguments, Probst said.
Probst also grew uncomfortable with the way Sandusky would put his hand on his leg, above his right knee, when he was riding in Sandusky’s car.
“It started making me feel uncomfortable... I kind of like pushed it away or…you know, pull away,” he said.
At one point, Probst confronted Sandusky about feeling uncomfortable with the way he touched his leg.
“He got a little mad,” Probst said of Sandusky’s reaction.
In one of their last conversations a few years ago, Probst said that Sandusky asked him if if he’d be willing to testify in his defense. Investigators had already reached out to Probst for questioning.
“I want to say, he asked if I would testify on his behalf. I didn’t have to go, he said it could be even over the phone, but I said, I don’t want [to be] involved in it,” Probst said.
Probst is currently taking a semester off from college. He said that he considers Sandusky a positive influence in his life.











so sandusky is calling all the boys that he never "closed the deal" with. He's not a monster; just "clingy" yeah, right.
Sandusky is a monster. The worst kind of monster. He is methodical. Calculating. Takes his time. And slowly grooms his child targets. This guy needs put away for life.
.
I have been a counselor for and to many young men who have had their lives ruined by so called nice guys. Those nice guys come in all shapes and sizes and job descriptions. It is very difficlult to help them through their personal pain, other than to help them realize that when you keep focusing on the pain, you are allowing that rapist/whatever to continue to do their thing to you over and over again! You have to not allow the perp to win, through building your life and proving you are a winner and a sucess is half the battle.
Many of us do not have the mental toughness to overcome what has been done to us at phases in our lives. It is not easy to come forward to face the lambasting you will get when you turn in someone who has victomized others. God be with all of you who have shared the life of being victomized by someone.
To me this kid is just victomizing these people all over again and to come out and say anything defending this f@$#ing freak piece of crap child rapist is about the biggest insult to the victims I could imagine.. Hope you rot in hell too Probst.
haterofstupid
So what? You feel Probst should just lie and paint this guy to be a monster he didn't experience? IMO he's being honest and definitely not defending the guy
He should testify against him, makes me sick to my stomach that it would be the other way around..He should know Sandusky is a sick creepy slug..
I can hear the Penn State spin machine cranking up all the way in CA. All the boys he was just "clingy" with are going to be coming out of the woodwork. Like the "good ol' boys" in the south, they are going to line up to defend Sandusky. I pray this old fart was only "clingy" with Frankie and that he's not in a state of denial.
pay attention: this kid is describing exactly how Sandusky would come on to the boys he "took a liking to"...
To his credit, he was able to stop it in its tracks.
He's not a monster. That's a mistake we make again and again in these kinds of cases; Presuming a human being is incapable of these kinds of heinous acts. Sandusky is the man next door, the person at your office, and sometimes it's even your close relative. We need to teach ourselves to never let our guard down and to never, ever create a picture in our minds of what we want people, who do these acts, to look like. Because they don't.
What Probst doesn't understand is that he was being groomed to be molested. The "clingyness", the hand on the leg, the constant contact, those were all ways Sandusky was using to see if he could get Probst to go along with the rapes and not tell anyone. Probst is damn lucky that all he got was a hand on the leg.
Probst does understand that he was being "groomed." He is supplying all the data that one needs to understand that, and he is definitely also saying that he was uncomfortable and was self-aware enough to break things off at an early stage. He is not being helpful to the Sandusky defence--if anything, he is undermining it, and he seems to know this. He is stating that even in cases where Sandusky did not molest boys, he was still engaging in inappropriate behaviors. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that a less self-aware or secure young man wouldn't have been able to break things off. I am glad the young man came forward--because he is certainly helpful in supplying accurate testimony to show that Sandusky did not have appropriate relationships even with those he didn't molest.
Seriously, the young man can only provide testimony on what happened to him. If this is what happened, then he needs to supply that accurate testimony. Inaccurate testimony can probably be shown to be inaccurate--and that might lead to a person who probably is guilty (he is still presumed innocent) getting off. Accuracy is really important in cases like this.
“...I don’t want [to be] involved in it,” Probst said. --- Unless of course some TV interview can net a few bucks, then it's okay to be "involved". This guy's credibility is close to zero.
You either ARE involved in it by testifying or being interviewed by reporters, or you're NOT involved in it by keeping your mouth shut and declining all opportunities to talk, either on the record or off of it. Period.
You are trivializing what happened to the other boys. Just because he didn't touch you (BTW you are very fortunate) does not mean he didn't molest others. You are right. He is NOT a monster. he is a pedophile and you are a jerk!
A guy now 20 something that knew the man when he was growing up and spent time being taken to football games and never molested him although he admits being uncomfortable at times. You call him a jerk because he doesn't want to believe someone he knows would molest other boys. He might be in denial but I don't think that qualifies him as a jerk in fact it makes me think you fit the description.
Calling Sandusky a monster is an insult to monsters. Sandusky is far worse.
Yes, yes, and the Flying Spaghetti Monster is downright wonderful and kind. Sandusky's definitely no monster!
Bob L,
Sandusky has been witnessed raping a 10 year old boy in the shower. It looks like there are 100s of people abused as children by this piece of crap. And because all Sandusky did was cop a feel on him a few times, Frankie says "he's not a monster?" Excuse me? One's judgement of this slime should be based only on one's personal experience with him? OK, this Frankie person may not be a jerk. How about MORON or IDIOT?
What ever happened to the presumption of innocence? I have represented many people accused of these types of crimes. You would be amazed how often the allegations are false. I have no idea whether Sandusky is guilty, and I will leave that up to the jury.
JSteve7, opinions are fine, as long as they are based on facts. As far as we know, the only person who says he saw Sandusky "raping" a 10 year old, is the same guy who says he did nothing and told no one until the next day. Putting a hand on your thigh, as uncomfortable or uninvited it may be, is not remotely "copping a feel". And yes, JSteve, your judgement of anyone should be based only on your personal experience. I suspect the idiotic moron may be much closer than Frankie.
It certainly does not look good for Sandusky and I think it isn't a surprise that he has supporters that felt he was a good role model. Every day people are arrested for crimes that shock their neighbors and friends. People are often floored to learn the "other" side of people they consider to be friends or a good neighbor.
Just because Frankie doesn't want to lie, doesn't mean he's condoning anything. It just means he's imparting what he knows to the best of his ability. He stated that he was uncomfortable. Probably wasn't easy for him to admit that much. You need to give credit where credit is due. He's not the one in question here. Sandusky is. And he put himself in that position. He is old enough to know and realize what is permissable, and he knew he was crossing the line. He has no one to blame but himself.
Hey Sandusky is certainly a monster. But you don't have to name call this person who comes forward with his experiences. This person is not trying to defend Sandusky. He clearly says that he didn't like touching and confronted Sandusky.
Don't be naive, folks. This dude is part of Sanpervsky's public relations spin machine, as was San's phone interview with the mainstream media guy. The Penn State spin machine is working overtime to shill out Paterno's alleged lung cancer, and plant the idea that good ol' Sandgrabme wasn't so bad after all, just clingy. These guys are gonna get away with it just like OJ did. Only the civil lawsuits will have any effect, to bankrupt the sicko, God willing.
Cookie Monster, Grover, Herry-- there are some great monsters out there that are beloved by kids of all ages, and that love kids too --in a decent way!
Tom: Just because this young man says that Sandusky did not molest him does not mean that he is trivializing what happened to the other boys...and, this young man might even have repressed memories, or be in denial or too embarrassed to admit or go into detail. It is a very hard thing for guys to talk about. This young man is not a jerk. If jerks like you pounce each time one of these young men speak out, they will stop talking...much like the victim #1 in the grand jury indictment has been bullied out of his high school now. I wish folks would back off these victims!!
Rick,
Now that's a brilliant statement. Most of the world cannot think Bernie Madoff is a scum bag?? How about the BTK killer? How about Hitler?
Unlike you, I certainly don't need the guy gropping my theigh in order to pass judgement on him. I believe Sandusky is a slime ball based on HIS OWN ADMISSIONS.
Tom, I don't understand why you are calling this young man a "jerk." He did not say he thinks Sandusky is innocent. He can only testify about what happened or didn't happen to him personally. He admitted that Sandusky made him uncomfortable by placing his hand on his thigh, something the victims also said Sandusky did to them. He also said he does not want to testify in Sandusky's defense. So, why the negativism?
Calling Mr. Probst a jerk is totally wrong and totally missing the point too. If you read his interview Mr. Probst gives you all the evidence you need to judge Sandusky. It is and can be VERY tough on Children to come to grips with events like this in their past. I am impressed he was able to come forward. His experiences are his, and I certainly hope they are limited to what he has said. But even in that interview above his statements certainly paint a poor light on the Accused. So really he corroborates Sandusky's purported behaviors.
Bill: we're not in a court of law. These are opinions people are voicing in the court of public opinion. We'd be surprised at how many kids lie and how many accused perpetrators are "innocent"? Why yes, counsel. We certainly would. Then again, we're not paid to defend them against kids whose only reward is the truth.
Pedophile's do not go after every boy, only ones they feel they can control, that's why you were "saved", but, according to his actions towards u when u broke it off, u knew damn well he was not "right".
Thank u for not testifying for him,.
................................
Hey Tom, why do you insult the poor guy? Because he was not victimized enough? Do you wish he had been raped too? Yes, he probably got lucky or Sandusky was busy with other victims. Either way, he can only testify about his own experience and what he says is troubling enough and incriminating for Sandusky. Hardly puts a dent in the prosecution case. He will also have to deal with the mental scars, if not from sexual abuse (although what he describes gets dangerously close) at least from the psychological one that comes from the feeling of betrayal.
The whole Penn State Culture, is undeniably, absurd, and disgusting, the problem is it is pervasive, in this society, when you have adults in POWER structures, and are supposedly responsible for the development of young men and women alike.
Tim - what a strange generalization. Adults are always in power positions compared to children. Some go over the line, most do not.
It's not just Penn State-- most colleges and universities have this culture of the professors and admin covering each others butt's and turning their backs on students and personnel unless they are confronted with outside forces, i.e. local police or federal authorities. Working at a college or university is a fairly cushy job with lots of benefits like free education for family members, the ability to go on school-sponsored trips in-country and abroad as well as a decent retirement packages. (Why do you think so many professors vie for tenure?) You don't want to mess that up by being a whistle-blower, even when you know someone is suffering because of your cowardice.
Yea... Most Pedophiles always appear as almost human
Think about it. In order to get away with it, they have to seem like really nice people, even admirable people.
That's part of what makes it so sickening.
Yeah, some even have "innocent sleepovers" with pre-pubescent boys.
They appear completely human, Ram, because they are.
Not sure I would term them totally human leroy. Think I would term them more sub-human sociopaths. And trash comes to mind.
Proud West Virginian,
Everyone knows Sandusky and any sex offender commits a horribly evil act. But what do you accomplish for yourself by calling him sub-human. It's like getting on a soapbox about how evil Hitler was. Duh! I wonder what you gain for yourself with your comments.
The administration at Penn State has brought in Louis Freeh to "investigate". Freeh did such a wonderful whitewash of government agents' actions at Ruby Ridge and Waco he is the perfect spin doctor for this assignment.
He doesn't to be involved in it. Yet he's on tv spewing bout it!
Any man that would put his hand on someones leg above the knee is looking for more than just the casual relationship. No one does that. Sandusky is a sick mofo. I hope they prove his guilt and he never sees the free world again.
No doubt. And note how he specified the right knee. Sandusky had to reach clear across the front seat. Can't get much more overt than that.
Sick SOB
Obviously Sandusky was grooming this kid so that he can victimize him - however the kid rejected his advances in a way that conveyed to Sandusky that he would not be an easy victim.
Unfortunately, the other children because of their age and maturity level could not rebut his pedophile advances.
This has been reported heavily - that Sandusky groomed the kids all in an effort to see how they would respond.
Not just age and maturity level-- a lot of these kids came from abusive or broken homes. They might have believed that if they didn't do what Sandusky wanted, they would get a beating or rejected. It's difficult for a young child to be constantly rejected by those he looks up to; it crushes their egos and takes away their sense of self-worth.
Innocent until proven guilty...............People and Press always try and "try" someone before their day in court.
Considered innocent until proven guilty.
He's guilty if he did it, no matter what the court has or hasn't done, no matter what it does or doesn't say.
Sandusky needs to be taken out of circulation so that innocent people can no longer be taken advantage of by him. Lock him up forever.
If there were any real "common sense" in your post, you would have acknowledged that you have no real idea about anyone's guilt. Unless you were there.
Actually, one Rick to another, your philosophy is not at all in keeping with our justice system. I'm not saying that he should be tried in this forum, but a person can certainly be judged by another, say someone on a jury, without having been there. Murder would be a pretty easy thing to get away with if your logic held true.
I strongly suspect, that OK?, that this guy is guilty. The statement that there was only the one occurrence that drew attention to him is not true. This investigation went on for a long time. Ask the mother who contacted him to tell him to stay away from her son.
Pithy little comments like yours about "common sense" reflect a lack of yours, I'm afraid.
He was seen raping a 10 year old boy, what the hell more proof of guilt do you need?
Mr. Wonderful--and, if your ex-wife produces a person who swears that you raped a child, shall we immediately believe that person? There are a lot of people who will swear on their mother's grave that this or that person has done something, when the person did not do that thing. In fact, it is often the accusers who are guilty and are trying to shift blame to someone else.
Eye-witness testimony is one of the least persuasive forms of evidence, and it is one form of evidence (right after jailhouse informants) often shown to be false.
We do not know what happened. I strongly suspect that this person is guilty--in fact, I'll probably believe that he was guilty even if he is found not guilty--but the point remains that we should not presume guilt on the basis of eye witness testimony or even the testimony of those who claim to be victims, particularly when those people stand to get a lot of money from a successful civil suit.
People do lie. That is why we have a court system to investigate thoroughly--I expect that Sandusky will be found guilty, and I even expect that he is factually guilty, but let's not start generalizing that all eye witness testimony is completely infallible, okay?
Why come out now? Is this the path being taken to buy off these boys who are now adults. How many more will come forward in Sandusky's defense and claim " nothing"abusive took place. Looks like money talks to let the guilty walk. What a great country we live in. In any other country Sandusky's ass would be grass from the git-go.
Don't worry Helen, it is.
Please Helen, tell us about this money....
Build up... rock city blazes the way for the TRUTH...more like, should come with a warning. We SEE U rock city...Get er DONE.
?
Hey Arnold, when you figure out what Memphis Beat just said can you let me know haha....I don't think his explanation will help me much.
I believe Sandusky is a pervert, BUT I also believe that some of the blame belongs to the victims for not telling someone what was being done to them! I can't believe that they were too scared to tell even their parents or some other relative about how Sandusky was touching them until they became adults!!!!
It shows how little you know. That you would attempt to shift any of the blame on the victims is terrible. Children who are abused are confused, terrified, fear no one will believe them. They're controlled by their abuser. You can't believe they're too scared to tell anyone? Well, they are.
I cannot believe that you actually put some of the blame on the victims. You are talking about CHILDREN. You cannot blame kids for to being afraid or confused or not know whom to trust to tell that this guy was molesting them or even just making them feel uncomfortable or weird. Everyone thought this guy was a hero, for Pete's sake.
You're a total idiot. You have no clue what these pedophiles do to threaten and control their victims, and the guilt the victims suffer. Do a little research before you open your mouth to prove what an idiot you are.
Don't forget you're talking about impressionable kids here. They are seduced into the abusive situation with special treatment and gifts. They don't know any better. By the time they are old enough to understand what happened to them the damage is already done. They are shamed into silence.
I know from personal experience. It's hurtful and insulting to hear people like you blame the victim.
??? Please tell me you are attempting to be sarcastic, or funny. If you are not: Considering the stigma that many boys associate with homosexuality and the fact that our society still expects boys to be "stronger" and more capable of taking care of themselves, I'm not surprised one bit that this took as long as it did to come out. No one wants to be a victim and sometimes they will go into denial before dealing with it. The fact it was being done to them by someone in a position of power and trust can be very confusing and upsetting. Teenagers are still growing children in many ways. If you want to blame the victims as well, go ahead. I suggest that you also take a look in the mirror and blame yourself as well. Why not? Aren't you a part of our society, the same society that seems to teem with people willing to turn a blind eye? What? No? You don't blame yourself? Yeah. Kind of ridiculous, isn't it?
There has never been a more ignorant comment in the history of life in the blogosphere.
This is in response to Eldon White clearly a social worker with great credentials ???
Ever been molested Eldon? Know what kind of tactics these guys use? Doubt it. The court system usually ends up favoring and even protecting the pervs, so do you think you'd feel proud of being publicly humiliated and called a liar? Try putting yourself in these boys' shoes before you judge them. He's the guy with the big bucks, and what this boy is trying to say is he was one of those who rejected his advances before he had a chance to start them. Put it where its at. He's the monster, not the boys.
The fact is, Eldon, the MAJORITY of children who are molested do not tell anyone. They are too ashamed, embarrassed, feel disgusted with themselves for "allowing" the abuse to happen. It is not until they are adults that they hopefully come to the realization that it was not in ANY WAY their fault, and they can stop blaming themselves, tell the secret, and receive healing.
Hey dummies, Eldon has a point. This abuse was allegedly going on for many years. Most of these victims are FULL GROWN ADULTS now! If they knew this guy was an abuser, why didn't they come forward sooner? I think initially only one victim came forward. The rest were either ferreted out by the police or came forward only after the story broke. The police said it took the recent Sandusky TV interview to FINALLY persuad many of these ADULT victims to tell their story. That's a disgrace! These men are cowards! Maybe we can excuse a ten year old for not speaking up, but every one of these guys should have come forward as soon as they were old enough to make sense of what happened to them.
How many kids could have been saved if one of these guys had the the stones to step forward sooner? You all are willing to crucify Joe Paterno who at least notified his superiors even though he didn't witness a single act of abuse, but you give these adult victims a free pass? Being a victim doesn't absolve them of responsibility. In fact it makes them all the more responsible as they have first hand knowledge of just how much suffering Sandusky was capable of inflicting on others. They knew it and through their cowardice they allowed countless others to fall prey to this man's evil.
What's wrong with you people? What if this were a different crime like murder and these kids witnessed someone getting killed? Wouldn't you expect them to come forward at least as adults if not right after it happened? Man you politically correct morons drive me up a wall. Think a little bit instead of letting your emotions guide your opinions.
Eldon: BLAME THE CHILDREN FOR BEING MOLESTED???? geez, I don't know which is sicker...the abusers or the excusers.
JW-769944 have you ever been molested? Do you have any idea what it is like to be a child and have an adult make you touch their penis? Have you ever had to place another persons penis in your mouth to satisfy them as a child? Better yet have you ever been fondled by your grandfather and had his semen on you? If you have never been put in such a situation, had your innocence taken from you and then sent them to prison for doing what they did you have no right calling these adults cowards. Until you have walked in their shoes you will never know the emotions they will feel for the rest of their lives.
"Hey dummies, Eldon has a point."
no he doesnt, shame guilt and fear conflicting feelings are what keep victims of sexual abuse from talking...shame that they were sexually abused,..guilt, because they often were manipulated into thinking they wre complicit in the abuse,...fear of retaliation by abuser, and that they wopnt be believed,....conflicted because the abuser often gains the victims trust, will give the victim gifts take them places etc etc..leaving the victim feeling like the abuser is not completely bad....many of these feelings are impossible for adolecent and teenagers to negotiate....its not until adulthood when one is able to rationalize what happened...and often it takes an epiphany of some sort like a news story or a famous person declosing about an abusive past, therapy, etc... for people to com forward...and if you are male abused by another male you are many times more likely to not report the incident...men are considered powerful in control....victimhood is what happens when you loose that power..for men this has a deep sense of shame for not being incontrol....then there is the fear of being judged about your sexuality...male on male sexual abuse is homosexual by its very nature and most males have a deep sense of regret when abused by an adult.
Eldon does have a point. At least one of the boys did, in fact, tell someone at the time. That is why Sandusky lost his job. And, the fact that at least one of the boys (and it appears to have been more than that) said something at the time is actually extremely helpful. We encourage children to tell us about abuse, and many of them do. It is not actually the rule that children are too afraid to tell anyone.
In fact, it facilitates abuse to be telling people that children won't tell, especially boys won't tell. Abusers start to think that they can terrify children into not talking, and so they feel more free to abuse.
How about some dialogue here on convincing children that it is okay to tell someone about abuse and some dialogue about children who have done so? Not all children are that terrified--many try to reach out, and if people were a bit more tuned in, they might notice.
Yes, Eldon has a point--badly expressed and overgeneralized and problematic, but everyone who is overgeneralizing in return makes the problem worse.
That one boy who did tell did so reluctantly, after his mother picked up on his covert signals and prodded the information out of him. The most obvious signal being that he asked her how to find out if Sandusky was on a sex offender list.
Eldon and JW don't have a clue and are the reason most boys don't tell.
This young man is a victim, a person whom Mr. Sandusky groomed for years. This all part of the game these sick individuals play. When the young man decided he didnt like to have his leg touched he withdrew. God knows how far this would have gone if he had been just a little responsive to his advances.
I'm sure the other kids were not "responsive" to Sandusky's advances either. They just didn't know what to do or how to get away.
He didn't know, he didn't know, it wasn't a required course when he was at Penn State an it still isn't? He's not responsible for anything that they didn't teach in college? It's not like he went to Law School? Does he need any more excuses?
You know it's perfectly normal to...shower with underage boys?
I couldn't even say that to be sarcastic with a straight face.
Probst eventually began to pull away from Sandusky when Sandusky began to demand more and more of his time.
Yeah, you know who else are clingy? CHILD MOLESTERS.
And when coach Sandusky said "no horseplay," little did the students know what he meant!
to everyone who now feels compelled to mention how you knew this creep and can't believe him capable of the allegations ............... these are master predators ........... they are experts in hiding their evil ............... blending in and seeming forthright and perfectly normal are a few of their most powerful tools in cruising under the scum radar for extremely long periods of time
Joey, do you like movies about gladiators?
Seriously though, I used to hitchhike a lot when I was younger. The hand on the knee move meant it was time to get out at the next light. There are a lot of really sick people out there.
Ever been in a Turkish prison, Joey?
Ever shower with your dad, Joey????
Close enough on the last one.
Yeah Pedo/Penn State!!!
He was clingy with him because he probably looked younger than 14 but pedophiles have a specific age range they target. It's highly unlikely that Sandusky would have raped him anyway given his profile. He targeted 7-10 year olds. 14 was too old for him.
So now where are all the Paterno/enabler supporters telling us how much joe did for the University???
Fortunately, myremoore, there are no fools out today trying to make this Paterno's problem.
Well, former student, you just did not know him. All the other folks are idiots? Don't think so.
"All the other folks..."? really!
It is clear that the dude in this 'news' release is being used by the pro Sandusky crowd and the 'cover our ass' Penn State cretins.
That is most likely what is happening so look for a couple of dozen former 'proteges' of this pedophile to come forward and say Jerry is a great guy.
Nothing happened.
I call bull crap on their testimony as it is not germaine to current actions.
The Penn State dudes who covered this pedophile's ass should be charged with being accomplices and jailed for life. That is my opinion.
But that is NOT the point is it ? The point is that this clearly defined 'pervert' has been accused by many now men who were in some fashion 'befriended' in shower rooms, single beds in a basement and fondled in a car or restaurant.
It is those victims who actually count in this game of child perversion.
Josh, re- read the article. The young man refused to testify for Sanduskey. Said he wanted no part of it. Told his story so others would also want no part of any cover - up or pro Sanduskey testimony.
geesh, get some reading glasses so you see the whole article.